<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[RME User Forum — Babyface Pro FS dynamics - compressor in DSP?]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?id=40095</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forum.rme-audio.de/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=40095&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Babyface Pro FS dynamics - compressor in DSP?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:33:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Babyface Pro FS dynamics - compressor in DSP?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=225953#p225953</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>hi, </p><p>good to know reverb/delay are not computed on the device and makes sense</p><p>that must mean there is not much processing power left in the FPGA when 5 eq&#039;s at 96k uses 55% of it&#039;s DSP allocation</p><p>still would be curious how many compressors one could get in there*</p><p>imagining funky clean strat, sounds amazing direct with some eq, but missing compression obviously</p><p>same for vocal or experimental sounds of physical objects</p><p>- - - -</p><p>*have ADI-2 DAC FS, and want some useful inputs for smaller recording sessions, i don&#039;t like UCX II, because it has only 6 outputs + HP, then I would rather get Madiface XT II, to have useful amount of outputs, when working with multichannel speaker setups</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (timeltdme)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=225953#p225953</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Babyface Pro FS dynamics - compressor in DSP?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=224042#p224042</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>FYI, the reverb and delay are not on the DSP but calculated by the host computer. That is possible because they don&#039;t need zero latency like the eq.<br />There is no DSP chip afaik, the eq are on the fpga.<br />Bigger interfaces with FX have DSP. Also has to do with the fact our Babyface is bus powered.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (vinark)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2024 08:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=224042#p224042</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Babyface Pro FS dynamics - compressor in DSP?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=224040#p224040</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>yesterday I was using BFProFS for the first time and was surprised there are no compressors.</p><p>I mean are they THAT demanding on the DSP?</p><p>My usage with 3 input eqs 2 output eqs and reverb was somewhere about 55% on the DSP meter @ 96k.</p><p>I would be happy even for a couple of compressors on some of the input channels. And would prefer using sw reverb and other non time critical fx, if that would help.</p><p>The interface sounds good as expected from FS.</p><p>Thanks.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (timeltdme)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2024 07:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=224040#p224040</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
