<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[RME User Forum — TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?id=42030</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forum.rme-audio.de/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=42030&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 17:22:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249613#p249613</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Personally, i think the color&#039;s do not translate well with the different options of the &#039;Light&#039; mode.<br /> Comparing the different settings looks like this: </p><p>Light-Normal<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/mVcH4dCz/Light-Normal.png" alt="https://i.ibb.co/mVcH4dCz/Light-Normal.png" /></span><br />Light-Dark<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/7J6Nb39P/Light-Dark.png" alt="https://i.ibb.co/7J6Nb39P/Light-Dark.png" /></span><br />Light-High-Contrast.<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/tTvSk0V3/Light-High-Contrast.png" alt="https://i.ibb.co/tTvSk0V3/Light-High-Contrast.png" /></span></p><br /><p><strong>Light-Normal</strong> = pastel color&#039;s<br /><strong>Light-Dark</strong> = would be fine as &#039;light&#039; setting <br /><strong>Light-High-Contrast </strong>= pastel color&#039;s with less saturation</p><p>Is it just me, or is not saturated enough? <br />Instead of different settings which might not work for everyone, two sliders for <strong>SATURATION</strong> and <strong>BRIGHTNESS</strong> would do the job from my point of view. <br /><strong>+</strong> a color palette for defining e.g. 16 user color&#039;s<br /><strong>++</strong> setting to colorise the channelstrip background or not (would result in channel header and text color only) <br /><strong>+++</strong> setting for the meter color. (But the green is ledendary and worked fine for 25 years..)</p><p>But that might be really too late for a release.candidate...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (nicoduda)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 17:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249613#p249613</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249602#p249602</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>LarsErik wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>A bit late to the party, installed the beta yesterday and I really like how this looks, feels and behaves. Thanks RME!</p></blockquote></div><p>It&#039;s nerver too late. Especially for RC&#039;s ;-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (nicoduda)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 13:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249602#p249602</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249601#p249601</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />TM-RC1 and DigiCheck running fine here so far. <br /><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/99CML6hH/TM-RC1.png" alt="https://i.ibb.co/99CML6hH/TM-RC1.png" /></span></p><br /><p>Only little Glitch i could found is this: </p><p>The &#039;High Cont&#039; string wraps to: <br />High<br />Cont <br />;-) i guess a few pixels are missing...<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/BVfSvxMD/UCXSettings.png" alt="https://i.ibb.co/BVfSvxMD/UCXSettings.png" /></span> </p><p>Thanks a lot for this nice update!</p><p>TotalMix FX Version 2.00 Release Candidate 1 (1)<br />FireFace UCX MK1 on macOS 26.3 via USB kernel driver</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (nicoduda)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 13:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249601#p249601</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249573#p249573</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A bit late to the party, installed the beta yesterday and I really like how this looks, feels and behaves. Thanks RME!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (LarsErik)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 10:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249573#p249573</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249536#p249536</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We love the mic icon at the top of input channels, showing gain and +48V at a glance. Out first instinct was to click on it to adjust the auxiliary device settings.</p><p>How about making it clickable to open and close the settings just like the settings icon?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carich)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 17:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249536#p249536</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249485#p249485</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p><p>I created an example with some changes in channels UI for better readability to eliminate the «grey spot visibility», if you don&#039;t mind!</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/ZpNvRTCB/Changes2.png" alt="https://i.ibb.co/ZpNvRTCB/Changes2.png" /></span></p><p>OR</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/y9v1dLJ/Changes3.png" alt="https://i.ibb.co/y9v1dLJ/Changes3.png" /></span></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (technoiswatchingyou)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 22:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249485#p249485</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249236#p249236</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello.</p><p>Currently, the low-cut filters in TotalMix2 are hardly useful, for they have a very high bottom cutoff limit at 20Hz, which creates massive overshooting regardless of the filter order, hence causing clipping if the digital levels are close to unity dBFS.</p><p>Please lower the minimum cutoff to 1Hz so that it can be used as a gentle DC-blocker.</p><p>If quantisation noise in float-precision is an issue with higher-order HP filters due to a biquad-based implementation, I&#039;d suggest using topology-reserving filters such as the ones in Zavalishin&#039;s book.</p><p>Best,<br />Dario</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Dario Sanfilippo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 18:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249236#p249236</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249185#p249185</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Holy cow, how did that change ? Sorry for the mess !</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (waedi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 09:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249185#p249185</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249184#p249184</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That is TM FX 1.99.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (MC)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 09:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249184#p249184</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249183#p249183</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Audio AG Support wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I think it&#039;s always on now.</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Hmm ? <br />Doesn&#039;t look like</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/N2dJqL8T/frame-on.png" alt="https://i.ibb.co/N2dJqL8T/frame-on.png" /></span></p><br /><p>Also the color no longer is on the channel field, only the channel name is in color ?</p><p>Please compare to post 192</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/KcX4hfkY/color.png" alt="https://i.ibb.co/KcX4hfkY/color.png" /></span></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (waedi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 09:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249183#p249183</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249182#p249182</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#039;s always on now.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Audio AG Support)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 08:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249182#p249182</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249181#p249181</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>MC wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>TotalMix FX 2.0 is now available as <strong>beta 7</strong></p><p><strong>New</strong><br />- Selected submix output with optional highlighting frame<br />- Highlighting frame can be enabled/disabled in Preferences (F2)</p></blockquote></div><p>Is this feature cancelled ? Did I miss something ?</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/VYNJqS7g/prefs.png" alt="https://i.ibb.co/VYNJqS7g/prefs.png" /></span></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (waedi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=249181#p249181</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=248940#p248940</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm that with Babyface Pro fs.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Kubrak)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=248940#p248940</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=248930#p248930</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for working out this good PDF !<br />I have to agree, you are right.<br />I did reproduce this with Babyface Pro offline device. <br />It needs to ON/OFF the submix mixer layout to bring it into correct order.<br />I think this is a bug, in Totalmix, not only your interface Madiface Xt ll</p><p>Let RME check this out. May be we have wrong expectations...?</p><p>Edit : Did check with TM 1.99 same behavior</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (waedi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 22:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=248930#p248930</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: TotalMix FX 2.0 – first beta available for macOS]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=248929#p248929</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>waedi wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>The snapshot does not memorize the selected output, it saves the mix for all outputs regardless which output is active.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes, snapshots store a complete mix and not the selected output channel.</p><p>In our test, the source channels shown do not change when a snapshot is activated without changing the selected output channel or leaving submix layout mode, even when the activated mix changes which source channels are present in the selected output channel.</p><p>The problem is easily reproduced, as illustrated in <a href="http://littlemountainmusic.org/download/stale_submix.pdf">http://littlemountainmusic.org/download … submix.pdf</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carich)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 18:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=248929#p248929</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
