<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[RME User Forum — HDSPe AoX-D's Dante Latency]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?id=43177</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forum.rme-audio.de/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=43177&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in HDSPe AoX-D's Dante Latency.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 04:36:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: HDSPe AoX-D's Dante Latency]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250809#p250809</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m gonna buy one and try it myself.</p><p>Dante Network can work standalone but will need to setup the routing first, using Dante controller or Console which have the ability to patching Dante devices.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (a7564851)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 04:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250809#p250809</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: HDSPe AoX-D's Dante Latency]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250757#p250757</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The Kubrak-trick may work with the Digiface USB, but RME never confirmed this as supported operation.</p><p>You have to test your self with the AoX, I guess some routing can still work but Dante network not working without computer ?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (waedi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250757#p250757</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: HDSPe AoX-D's Dante Latency]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250754#p250754</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>waedi wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Standalone-mode would need a special firmware and Totalmix routing setup and driver settings stored in the card, this is not the case.<br />This interface is not designed for standalone operation.</p></blockquote></div><p>It’s not really the case cause based on the reply in another topic, it’s because power issue and also didn’t have the ability to store the setting. But if I manage to keep it powered, will it keep the routing like kubrak said in the link I provided below?</p><p><a href="https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?id=40246">https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?id=40246</a></p><p>And yeah I already asked the support, AoX-D’s Dante Latency can go to 0.25ms.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (a7564851)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250754#p250754</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: HDSPe AoX-D's Dante Latency]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250752#p250752</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Standalone-mode would need a special firmware and Totalmix routing setup and driver settings stored in the card, this is not the case.<br />This interface is not designed for standalone operation.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (waedi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250752#p250752</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: HDSPe AoX-D's Dante Latency]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250748#p250748</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Audio AG Support wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I tested the latency from the AOX Madi vs a Madiface USB on a M1 MacMini. And the latency is almost equal. Actually the Madiface USB is a few microseconds faster. This due to extra safety buffers on the Thunderbolt connection in the MacOs. On a Windows machine you could gain some latency. The Dante latency comes on top of this Thunderbolt Latency.</p></blockquote></div><p>Wow, never thought that MADIface USB&#039;s latency will be lower than AOX via Thunderbolt.<br />But a few microseconds is okay for me so it&#039;s not a big deal. I can have more channel using AOX.</p><p>BTW, I remember that AoX-D and AoX-M can&#039;t performing in standalone mode due to PCIE enclosure&#039;s power design right? If there&#039;s no computer connected to enclosure, it&#039;ll cut the power so can&#039;t operate in standalone mode?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (a7564851)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 11:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250748#p250748</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: HDSPe AoX-D's Dante Latency]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250718#p250718</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I tested the latency from the AOX Madi vs a Madiface USB on a M1 MacMini. And the latency is almost equal. Actually the Madiface USB is a few microseconds faster. This due to extra safety buffers on the Thunderbolt connection in the MacOs. On a Windows machine you could gain some latency. The Dante latency comes on top of this Thunderbolt Latency.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Audio AG Support)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 08:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250718#p250718</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: HDSPe AoX-D's Dante Latency]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250671#p250671</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Waedi,</p><p>Dante Latency is for Dante Network’s buffer, so I want it can go to the lowest setting that Dante can offer.</p><p>I’ll try to reach out to dealer in my country, thanks!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (a7564851)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 12:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250671#p250671</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: HDSPe AoX-D's Dante Latency]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250666#p250666</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is it on Mac or Windows ?</p><p>0,25 ms is very low latency, I think VST instruments on their own have more latency which can&#039;t get compensated by any driver.</p><p>I would ask the dealer for an option try before buy, may be you can take your computer to the store and make a test with measurement with the RTL utility software.</p><p><a href="https://oblique-audio.com">https://oblique-audio.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (waedi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 12:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250666#p250666</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[HDSPe AoX-D's Dante Latency]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250661#p250661</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>I want to know how low can AoX-D&#039;s Dante latency go, as far as I know that lowest Dante latency can be 0.25ms.</p><p>And if I only use it&#039;s MADI for hosting VST plugins during live gig, will it&#039;s latency go as low as HDSPe MADI? or is it noticeable compare to other MADI interface like MADIface or UFX+/III?</p><p>I have a UFX+ and I use it&#039;s MADI a lot during live gig for VST host, I want to know if I can have better or similar result by using PCIE card w/ enclosure. Currently want to use Echo Express SE III as enclosure.</p><p>Best,<br />Sean.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (a7564851)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=250661#p250661</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
