<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[RME User Forum — ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?id=43427</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forum.rme-audio.de/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=43427&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in ADI 2 FS refresh?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 19:57:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=253227#p253227</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>KaiS wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Berthold Collins wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>RME Support wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>AK5572 and AK4490, same as the ADI-2 Pro FS.</p></blockquote></div><p>The very first revision, yes.</p></blockquote></div><p>I did a comprehensive comparison ADI-2 Pro silver face 1st generation, vs ADI-2/4 Pro SE, which even is old AKM vs new ESS chips.</p><p>It was a precisely (within a few 1/100th dB) level matched blind A/B with statistical score.<br />The simple question asked: which one sounds better.<br />Took about half a day of listening to a broad spectrum of music styles and thousands of switchings back and forth.</p><p>Result was as close as it can get:<br />49:51 hits for each (don’t ask which was which).</p><p>In fact it was impossible to distinguish between the two – once I thought I had nailed the difference (blindly), when revealing the assignment it was 50:50 I was right.<br />There was no certain characteristics that would have made it possible to identify one unit.</p><p>On paper the converter chips get better and better here and there, in small increments.</p><p>Practically, we have long reached such a high quality level that audible improvements are hard to achieve with neutral and transparent sounding devices.</p><p>If someone needs something different, EQ and effects processing is the way to go.</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;ve actually tested this exact example on other models.<br />When comparing the AKM vs. ESS versions of the Babyface Pro FS, the ESS version sounds slightly brighter—by about 1 to 2%.<br />Then, when I compared the ESS-based Babyface Pro FS against the UCX II, the sound was almost indistinguishable (though the UCX II has a slightly larger waveform).<br />That part is actually pretty fascinating.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (bassfatcat)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 19:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=253227#p253227</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=253068#p253068</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Viennacalling wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>very interesting - what components did you use an which headphone?</p></blockquote></div><p>AUDEZE LCD 4, Hifiman HE 1000 original.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (KaiS)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=253068#p253068</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=253067#p253067</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>very interesting - what components did you use an which headphone?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Viennacalling)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=253067#p253067</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=253003#p253003</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Berthold Collins wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>RME Support wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>AK5572 and AK4490, same as the ADI-2 Pro FS.</p></blockquote></div><p>The very first revision, yes.</p></blockquote></div><p>I did a comprehensive comparison ADI-2 Pro silver face 1st generation, vs ADI-2/4 Pro SE, which even is old AKM vs new ESS chips.</p><p>It was a precisely (within a few 1/100th dB) level matched blind A/B with statistical score.<br />The simple question asked: which one sounds better.<br />Took about half a day of listening to a broad spectrum of music styles and thousands of switchings back and forth.</p><p>Result was as close as it can get:<br />49:51 hits for each (don’t ask which was which).</p><p>In fact it was impossible to distinguish between the two – once I thought I had nailed the difference (blindly), when revealing the assignment it was 50:50 I was right.<br />There was no certain characteristics that would have made it possible to identify one unit.</p><p>On paper the converter chips get better and better here and there, in small increments.</p><p>Practically, we have long reached such a high quality level that audible improvements are hard to achieve with neutral and transparent sounding devices.</p><p>If someone needs something different, EQ and effects processing is the way to go.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (KaiS)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 17:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=253003#p253003</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252999#p252999</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>RME Support wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>AK5572 and AK4490, same as the ADI-2 Pro FS.</p></blockquote></div><p>The very first revision, yes.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Berthold Collins)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 11:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252999#p252999</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252998#p252998</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>RME Support wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>There isn&#039;t much to change or improve here, the feature set is limited, it&#039;s just an AD/DA converter. Don&#039;t hesitate if it suits your needs.</p></blockquote></div><p>It could just become a better AD/DA converter... to match the quality of the other units ;-)...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Berthold Collins)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 11:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252998#p252998</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252941#p252941</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s good enough to do so <img src="https://forum.rme-audio.de/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (MC)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 07:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252941#p252941</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252936#p252936</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>BOY wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>RME Support wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>There isn&#039;t much to change or improve here, the feature set is limited, it&#039;s just an AD/DA converter. Don&#039;t hesitate if it suits your needs.</p></blockquote></div><p>Hello Daniel, thank you for the prompt and informative response!</p><p>As a quick aside, I am having trouble finding information regarding the chip components used for AD/DA for the ADI 2 FS. Is there anywhere you or anyone else might direct me to find this information?</p><p>Thank you ever so much!</p></blockquote></div><p>I also have one on hand. But I estimate that down the line, if they upgrade the clocks batch by batch, we’ll more likely see products like:</p><p>Babyface Pro EX<br />UFX EX<br />802 EX<br />UCX EX<br />ADI-2 EX</p><p>...unless they stick with the FS clock for more than 10 years.&quot;</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (bassfatcat)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 18:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252936#p252936</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252920#p252920</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>AK5572 and AK4490, same as the ADI-2 Pro FS.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (RME Support)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 17:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252920#p252920</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252915#p252915</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>RME Support wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>There isn&#039;t much to change or improve here, the feature set is limited, it&#039;s just an AD/DA converter. Don&#039;t hesitate if it suits your needs.</p></blockquote></div><p>Hello Daniel, thank you for the prompt and informative response!</p><p>As a quick aside, I am having trouble finding information regarding the chip components used for AD/DA for the ADI 2 FS. Is there anywhere you or anyone else might direct me to find this information?</p><p>Thank you ever so much!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (BOY)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 15:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252915#p252915</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252911#p252911</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There isn&#039;t much to change or improve here, the feature set is limited, it&#039;s just an AD/DA converter. Don&#039;t hesitate if it suits your needs.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (RME Support)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252911#p252911</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ADI 2 FS refresh?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252910#p252910</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello! I hope this finds you well.</p><p>I wanted to enquire if the ADI 2 FS will be refreshed or updated at some point soon? I understand the pro model has had a special edition and now an EX version releasing in the very near future. But I wonder where that leaves the ADI 2 FS.</p><p>If there is an update in the works, I might hold off purchasing the ADI 2 FS. I only need a simple box with the highest A/D conversion RME can provide for my recording sessions. And these newer units like the 2/4 SE and no doubt the EX generate a lot more heat alongside features not useful for me.</p><p>If anyone has any knowledge, or that might be able to direct me to a more suitable A/D converter please do let me know! I&#039;d be greatly appreciative! <img src="https://forum.rme-audio.de/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (BOY)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=252910#p252910</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
