<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[RME User Forum — Long coaxial MADI runs]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?id=675</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forum.rme-audio.de/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=675&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Long coaxial MADI runs.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:18:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Long coaxial MADI runs]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=3079#p3079</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>New! The website of the official RME partner for cableware &amp; accessories is now online: <a href="http://www.alva-audio.com">www.alva-audio.com</a>.</p><p>regards<br />K.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Knut)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=3079#p3079</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Long coaxial MADI runs]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=2981#p2981</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much.&nbsp; We will be plugging it in soon to see if it works.&nbsp; I guess if worst comes to worst, we can always cut the cable and put in a reconstruction amplifier.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mellifluent life)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=2981#p2981</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Long coaxial MADI runs]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=2962#p2962</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Did you try to run the HDSP-MADI with the ADI-648 connected via 400 feet (121 meters) coax cable? if cable and connectors are high quality maybe it works.<br />But the comments about electric disturbances,as given by Stefan Flock, are still valid.</p><p>To give an idea about fiber specs., for Fiber-cables like we, but also most other, offer:</p><p>Weight: 4 kg / km<br />Tensile Load:&nbsp; 600N&nbsp; [EN187000/501(IEC 60794-1-E1)]<br />Min. Bend Radius:&nbsp; 20x Outer ?&nbsp; [EN187000/513(IEC 60794-1-E11)]<br />Operating Temperature:&nbsp; -500 to + 800 C&nbsp; [EN187000/601(IEC 60794-1-F1)]<br />Crush Resistance:&nbsp; 2000N&nbsp; [EN187000/504(IEC 60794-1-E3)]<br />Impact Resistance:&nbsp; 200 impacts / 1 N.m&nbsp; [EN187000/505(IEC 60794-1-E4)]<br />Flexing Resistance:&nbsp; 2000 cycles&nbsp; [EN187000/509(IEC 60794-1-E8)]<br /> (Based on military standards MIL-C 85045)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (JLU)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=2962#p2962</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Long coaxial MADI runs]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=2820#p2820</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Beyond the complications of properly engineering the cable system for the fiber (Which is a rather large and entirely undesirable task), I don&#039;t know that there is a huge reason beyond the mechanical limitations of fiber.&nbsp; Given the details of this installation we feel the need to use coaxial cable, even given this length restriction that we are dealing with now.&nbsp; We have done the engineering work to determine that coaxial cable is the cable we want to use; the task is now to figure out how to get it to work.&nbsp; I would like to give you more details about the installation, but I don&#039;t feel like I would be acting honestly to release any more information.</p><p>Thanks,<br />Nathan</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mellifluent life)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=2820#p2820</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Long coaxial MADI runs]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=2789#p2789</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We generally recommend fiber optic cable already for 100m or less. &#039;Moving platform&#039; indicates that there may be electric disturbances due to motors etc. that would also speak against using BNC cable.<br />Can you tell us more about the moving platform? Why is coaxial cable preferred to optical cable?</p><p>Kind regards,<br />Stephan Flock</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sf)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=2789#p2789</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Long coaxial MADI runs]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=2777#p2777</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have an application of the HDSP MADI and the ADI-648 that calls for a 400 foot (121 meters) MADI run with coaxial cable.&nbsp; Because the ADI648 will be mounted on a moving platform, it would be preferred to use coaxial cable to transmit the MADI instead of fiber optic.&nbsp; I understand that the maximum length of cable RME specifies is 100m, so I am curious if there is anything that can be done to get the full 400 feet with coax.&nbsp; Would anyone here be willing to offer some thoughts that might help us get this project up and working?</p><p>Peace,<br />-Nathan</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mellifluent life)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?pid=2777#p2777</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
