Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Hello! I am a new Babyface Pro FS user.

After a few weeks, I love this unit, and have enough understanding of TotalMix FX to use it reliably for my simple needs.

But I do have a question about a phantom power behavior that I do not understand, not noted in the manual (but not the manual's oversight) nor online that I can find. It concerns a specific mic, but I post here to learn if this behavior could harm the Babyface. (I'll go to the mic manufacturer to ask them about their part in this behavior.)

Question
I have a Rode NT1 and an Earthworks Ethos. I've discovered that the Ethos, when 48v power is engaged or disengaged, causes the Babyface's corresponding LED meter to rise to the red level, then settle back down, accompanied by several audible pops, not loud but certainly present.

Further, only when disengaging 48v power, the Ethos input audio turns to static (like white noise) which then dissipates over 5-6 seconds. I assume this is residual power in the mic draining away audibly as the LED meter falls. The effect is always with the Ethos, not the NT1.

So my question is: Is this normal behavior for some phantom powered mics, and could it damage the Babyface?

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

This is normal and does not cause any damage.

Regards
Daniel Fuchs
RME

1,453

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

got some (totally unrelated) quick questions.

Question 1: Is it feasible to make a software implementation of AutoSet in Totalmix? It wouldn't be as fast as in the DSP, but still be useful.

Question 2: What input gain and output volume and dBu switch setting should I choose if I want to input a mic and output it with exactly the same level?

Question 3: A Mac Mini is connected to the BBF via USB and runs a DAW or software instrument like Pianoteq that lets you choose sample rate. A PC is connected via Toslink to mix in all kinds of audio, like a CD Player. As stated in the manual I set clock source of the BBF to Optical In. It is also stated that a DVD Player (in this case the Mac) will be synced backwards from the BBF. So the PC syncs the BBF and the BBF syncs the Mac (via USB) and all is good?

UCX II, BBF Pro FS, Quadmic II, PCIe HDSPe Multiface II, AIO Pro

1,454

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

1 It would be a nice feature, a helping hand for soundchecks, even better if it can be a auto-soundcheck, setting the input gain 5dB lower than the auto-set.

2 A line level output shall output a mic level signal ?  I would do a cable loopback and compare and adjust the levels in Totalmix.

3 Yes, the Mac audio driver Core-Audio does sample rate conversions on the go to provide the correct music to you.

M1-Tahoe, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,455 (edited by ramses 2025-10-24 05:41:31)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Hopslost wrote:

Question 1: Is it feasible to make a software implementation of AutoSet in Totalmix? It wouldn't be as fast as in the DSP, but still be useful.

Question 2: What input gain and output volume and dBu switch setting should I choose if I want to input a mic and output it with exactly the same level?

[...]

to 1) not possible, because audio flows are not going through TM FX. TM FX is only for the control of the DSP.

to 2) I do not understand what your problem is. Input and output signal should be the same if the output fader is at 0 dB setting.

You can easily check it using an online tone generator: https://onlinetonegenerator.com/.
Send a sine wave and route it to any free HW output, ensure that the output fader is at 0dB setting.
Compare signal strength, its the same.

With the mic it will be the same, compare the input and output metering.

Maybe another thing we talk here about levels in the digital domain. The final level at the analog output depends on the reference level that you choose on the output. This line level signal is of course much higher compared to the very low signal which comes out of the mic and is being highly amplified by the preamp.

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,456

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Hi ramses and waedi,
As you are "masters" of Babyface (and others), may I ask you if you have an answer to my post #1397? I never received a response, unfortunately... THANKS A MILLION!

1,457

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Bassman wrote:

When I compare software loopback in TM versus hardware loopback (cable) on the analog input 1 and 2, I see a level difference of approx. 9.5 dB (input and output faders set at 0 dB, Gain set to 0 dB, and Pad=OFF). This difference does not appear when the output signal is connected via cable to input 3 or 4. Loopback via optical input/output also shows 0 dB difference between the two methods. Does it mean, that input 1 and 2 have an “initial” gain of approx. 10 dB when everything is set to 0 dB? Digicheck confirms that 0 dB corresponds to 8 dBu (approx. 2 Vrms). can someone confirm and explain, please?

I would have to try on my BFP, but no time right now. The difference between Mic and instr inputs may be also in setting the reference level in insr inputs (it may be +4 dBu, -10 dBV and boost). And tiny switch on bottom of BFP allows to switch output to +19 dBu or +4 dBu.

So, if you set switch to +4dBu and set Instr input to +4 dBu, the signal strenght should be more or less the same. Not so, if other combinations of settings are used.

FF UCX II, Digiface USB, Babyface Pro FS

1,458 (edited by ramses 2025-10-30 18:39:04)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Bassman wrote:

Hi ramses and waedi,
As you are "masters" of Babyface (and others), may I ask you if you have an answer to my post #1397? I never received a response, unfortunately... THANKS A MILLION!

Bassman wrote:

My apologizes if I am wrong here.
When I compare software loopback in TM versus hardware loopback (cable) on the analog input 1 and 2,
I see a level difference of approx. 9.5 dB (input and output faders set at 0 dB, Gain set to 0 dB, and Pad=OFF).
This difference does not appear when the output signal is connected via cable to input 3 or 4.
Loopback via optical input/output also shows 0 dB difference between the two methods.
Does it mean, that input 1 and 2 have an “initial” gain of approx. 10 dB when everything is set to 0 dB?
Digicheck confirms that 0 dB corresponds to 8 dBu (approx. 2 Vrms). can someone confirm and explain, please?

Before I look to manuals and technical data, could you please 1st of all clarifiy which product you have?
Babyface, Babyface Pro or Babyface Pro FS?

Then can you be more specific? You have at your output a signal (e.g. sine) of 0 dBFS
and then you see it on Analog 1+2 IN 9.5 dB higher or lower than 0 dBFS?
And on Analog 3+4 IN you see 0 dB? Same as on Analog 1+2 OUT?

When you use loopback in the digital domain, then you will get the same level. Maybe a little difference. If I remember right, MC told on forum that the Loopback signal will be slightly reduced (~ -0.2) to prevent overload/overs when recording at the input.

Suspicion, could have to do with different reference levels in the analog domain.

Thanks.

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,459

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Make sure no other channels are routed to that output and FX are OFF

M1-Tahoe, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,460

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

@ramses: I have Babyface Pro and Babyface Pro FS, same behavior on both units. You correctly interpreted regarding signals.
@waedi: Correct, no other channels routed to that output and FX = OFF
@Kubrak: I am aware of the gain switch on Babyface Pro FS, it is set to + 4 dBu
I am using NTi MR-Pro Signal Source.
Thank you for your response, highly appreciated :-)

1,461 (edited by ramses 2025-10-30 19:21:11)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Bassman wrote:

@ramses: I have Babyface Pro and Babyface Pro FS, same behavior on both units. You correctly interpreted regarding signals.
@waedi: Correct, no other channels routed to that output and FX = OFF
@Kubrak: I am aware of the gain switch on Babyface Pro FS, it is set to + 4 dBu
I am using NTi MR-Pro Signal Source.
Thank you for your response, highly appreciated :-)

Still you didn't answer my question regarding the level difference of 9.5 dB.

So you have a cable from AN 1+2 OUT to AN 1+2 IN.

Did you use a sine wave for testing?

Was the output signal 0 dBFS if not what is the exact value.

How strong was the input signal at AN 1+2 at 0 dB gain and without PAD?
a) - 9.5 dB
b) + 9.5 dB
c) other value.

Between AN 1+2 OUT and AN 1+2 IN: is this a balanced or an unbalanced connection?

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,462 (edited by ramses 2025-10-30 19:52:30)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

This is my calculation for BBF Pro FS

You should see a difference of 9 dB not with loopback cabled between AN1+2 OUT -> AN1+2 IN,
you should see this between AN1+2 OUT -> AN 3+4 IN
which is "case 2" in the screenshot below, balanced connection assumed.

See also manual ch 9.6 Analog recording:
Input channels 3 and 4 are found as TS jacks on the right side of the Babyface Pro. These Hi-Z universal inputs have an input impedance of 1 MOhm. The input gain is controlled and per-formed digitally and limited to 9 dB. An additional hardware-based
reference level optimizes the signal to noise ratio. Choices are +4 dBu and -10 dBV.

Therefore please ensure for AN 3+4 IN, that
a) the digital gain is set to 0 (click to wrench symbol) and
b) that ref level has been set to +4 dBu.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/5skhr648 … k&dl=1

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/5skhr648gwrjrrkbbx2rk/2025-10-30-BBF-Pro-FS-Line-loopback-cabled-AN1-2-OUT-to-AN1-2-IN-and-AN3-4-IN.jpg?rlkey=bpai0ejerejdatrwreyghcjzv&st=z7y6mv6k&dl=1

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,463

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

@ramses: Thanks a million, your calculation helped me a lot. For verification of my interpretation, I did some tests:
a) A signal (sinewave, 1 kHz and 440 Hz) with amplitude of 0 dBu is fed (symmetrically) to XLR 1, resulting in a -8.2 dBu display (which is correct for 2 V = 0 dB fullscale, gain = 0)
b) This signal is routed in TotalMix to XLR 1 out, also showing - 8.2 dB output signal in TotalMix
c) The ch 1 output signal on XLR 1 is (symmetric cable, + 19 dB gain) connected to XLR 2 input (PAD = ON = - 11 dB), resulting in total gain of 8 dB (19 - 11 = 8)
d) Input signal rading on channel 2 now shows - 8.9 dB, which is quite accurate and plausible.
Thank you again! Problem solved.

1,464 (edited by allreitzreserved 2025-11-15 09:49:29)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Hi everyone,
I’m experiencing a recurring issue with my Babyface Pro FS that I haven’t been able to diagnose, and I’m hoping someone here may have seen something similar.

Setup

MacBook Pro 16" (M1 Pro)
macOS Sequoia 15.5
RME USB driver 4.16
Babyface Pro FS powered by an external power supply
USB connection through Intona 7055-B (High-Speed USB Isolator) Intona plugged directly into the MacBook USB-C port
→ No USB hub in the chain
MacBook is powered via MagSafe (not via USB)

Issue

After power-up, everything runs perfectly stable at first
After about 60–90 minutes, sporadic audio dropouts begin
The issue occurs regardless of software:
Ableton Live, Apple Music / Spotify, YouTube / Safari
CPU / system load does not affect the issue
The Babyface does NOT fully disconnect
BUT: the orange microphone icon in the macOS menu bar briefly disappears, then reappears
During that moment, audio drops out completely for ~0.3–0.5 seconds
The dropouts become more frequent over time
Rebooting the MacBook does not fix the issue
However: switching to a different USB-C port on the MacBook immediately resolves the dropouts
→ then the system runs stable again for a longer time

Potentially relevant context

Before switching to the Babyface Pro FS, I previously used an RME Digiface USB, which also suffered from dropouts / brief USB interruptions during live shows.
Because of this, I purchased the Intona USB Isolator and a power conditioner (Furman).
Now with the Babyface Pro FS, the problem is different (no full disconnect), but it is similarly reproducible: dropouts that worsen over time.
In the studio, the same Mac USB port is 100% stable:
A CalDigit hub with multiple SSDs, display connections, other USB devices and an RME Fireface 802
No dropouts even during multi-hour sessions
So far, the issue appears only in live rigs, not in the studio.


Has anyone seen the behavior where the macOS microphone icon briefly disappears (but the interface doesn’t fully disconnect), causing short audio dropouts?
Could the Intona be forcing a USB resync that macOS handles silently as a brief audio interruption?
Are there macOS USB / power management settings or known workarounds that could influence this behavior with Apple Silicon Macs?
Would it be useful to test the Babyface without the Intona, or are there recommended USB port configurations for Apple Silicon laptops?
Are there known improvements or fixes in upcoming firmware/driver revisions regarding USB stability on macOS Sequoia?
Any insight would be greatly appreciated — especially if someone has experienced similar long-runtime-related dropouts without a full disconnect.

Thanks in advance!

1,465

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

You may update the RME driver to 427

Sure the firmware of the Babyface is the latest ?
What version is shown in the driver settings ?

Similar issues been reported and solved thru macOS upgrade to Tahoe 26

M1-Tahoe, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,466

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

ramses wrote:
kaserati wrote:

First BBF Pro FS has been upgraded TWO years ago and come on , the upgrade it was minimal, almost the same model. When it was released the babyface pro? SEVEN years ago?

The Babyface Pro was already quite a facelift compared to the Babyface, and with the Babyface Pro FS RME has gone one better.

And you think that wasn't much? Really ??? I think RME has improved a lot. May I remind you of the following changes, which you can also read off the product page at any time:
- 2nd reflevel +4 dBu to reduce the output level without too much loss of SNR/dynamics with switch on the bottom side
- SteadyClock FS
- Increase output power, improve THD of both headphone outputs
- Reduction of output impedance from 3.5mm KH output
- Improved SNR of microphone and TRS line inputs
- Improvement of THD of line inputs
- Fastest converters, even faster than those of the flagship interfaces with 6 samples less latency on AD (5/7 samples AD/DA at single speed)
- K-Slot for theft protection.

All the above improvements have been achieved without increasing the power consumption of the interface !!!
So and you think that was nothing ?

You should also bear in mind that the Babyface Pro FS can still be bus-powered on USB2. Therefore, it is not possible to make major changes to the design at will.

kaserati wrote:

The successor is going to be a model with DSP in 2022 for that reason you can't  find one,  this is not something new, some dealers know about that.

Well there I have some doubts as a full implementation of DSP chip would require more power from USB2.
At the moment it's still the case that EQ is being done in the device and Reverbs/Dynamics through the driver (using the PCs CPU).

We'll see ;-)

Hello. I'm new to Rme babyface pro fs and I see you Ramses have extensive experience. I was interested that you mention controlling the dynamics via software. I can't get compressor permission on my Babyface pro fs. The only thing I can control is Eq, low cut filter and Reverb and delay. But not the dynamics. I don't know if I'm missing something or I didn't understand you. Please excuse my poor English and I trust you won't mind replying to the older post. I wish everyone a nice day.

Babyface pro fs

1,467

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

ramses wrote:
kaserati wrote:

First BBF Pro FS has been upgraded TWO years ago and come on , the upgrade it was minimal, almost the same model. When it was released the babyface pro? SEVEN years ago?

The Babyface Pro was already quite a facelift compared to the Babyface, and with the Babyface Pro FS RME has gone one better.

And you think that wasn't much? Really ??? I think RME has improved a lot. May I remind you of the following changes, which you can also read off the product page at any time:
- 2nd reflevel +4 dBu to reduce the output level without too much loss of SNR/dynamics with switch on the bottom side
- SteadyClock FS
- Increase output power, improve THD of both headphone outputs
- Reduction of output impedance from 3.5mm KH output
- Improved SNR of microphone and TRS line inputs
- Improvement of THD of line inputs
- Fastest converters, even faster than those of the flagship interfaces with 6 samples less latency on AD (5/7 samples AD/DA at single speed)
- K-Slot for theft protection.

All the above improvements have been achieved without increasing the power consumption of the interface !!!
So and you think that was nothing ?

You should also bear in mind that the Babyface Pro FS can still be bus-powered on USB2. Therefore, it is not possible to make major changes to the design at will.

kaserati wrote:

The successor is going to be a model with DSP in 2022 for that reason you can't  find one,  this is not something new, some dealers know about that.

Well there I have some doubts as a full implementation of DSP chip would require more power from USB2.
At the moment it's still the case that EQ is being done in the device and Reverbs/Dynamics through the driver (using the PCs CPU).

We'll see ;-)

Hello. I'm new to Rme babyface pro fs and I see you Ramses have extensive experience. I was interested that you mention controlling the dynamics via software. I can't get compressor permission on my Babyface pro fs. The only thing I can control is Eq, low cut filter and Reverb and delay. But not the dynamics. I don't know if I'm missing something or I didn't understand you. Please excuse my poor English and I trust you won't mind replying to the older post. I wish everyone a nice day.

Babyface pro fs

1,468

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

HenryNH6 wrote:

I can't get compressor permission on my Babyface pro fs.

Dynamics compressor is not included, not available.
Babyface ProFS doesn't have a DSP chip for this.

M1-Tahoe, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,469 (edited by ramses 2026-02-08 05:13:25)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

For a list of interfaces with fully implemented FX, see my Excel.

https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?id=35156

The next higher interface with an excellent feature set is the UCX II with DSP supporting FX and also RoomEQ, Crossfeed.
It got some interesting features from the flagship interfaces (UFX III, II): DURec (Direct USB Recording) and a mic preamp with a gain range up to 75 dB. Also, Autoset and an AES port, which is useful for connecting one of the reference converters (ADI-2 *) and still having ADAT free for connecting additional devices (preamp, AD/DA converter).

Not included in this list are PCIe cards; the HDSPe MADI FX is the only PCIe card with a DSP supporting FX, RoomEQ, Crossfeed.

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,470 (edited by amarok 2026-02-10 10:32:44)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Change MIDI In/Out to Dual-Input in TotalMix FX

I use my BF Pro FS on the road and my question is: would it be possible to switch the MIDI Output to a second Input instead? I don't need any outputs playing live but I have two physical controllers for which I prefer DIN MIDI over USB. Currently I have to utilize a MIDI splitter but to reduce any additional devices it would be nice to know if the Babyface's hardware architecture would allow for a flexible MIDI Configuration via TotalMIX (In/Out, In/In, Out/Out).

Thanks!

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Not possible, sorry.

Regards
Daniel Fuchs
RME

1,472

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

waedi wrote:
HenryNH6 wrote:

I can't get compressor permission on my Babyface pro fs.

Dynamics compressor is not included, not available.
Babyface ProFS doesn't have a DSP chip for this.

Thank you very much for your reply. I thought I was missing the connections, but you confirmed my understanding that the babyface pro fs doesn't have a dsp chip for it. Have a beautiful day.

Babyface pro fs

1,473

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

ramses wrote:

For a list of interfaces with fully implemented FX, see my Excel.

https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?id=35156

The next higher interface with an excellent feature set is the UCX II with DSP supporting FX and also RoomEQ, Crossfeed.
It got some interesting features from the flagship interfaces (UFX III, II): DURec (Direct USB Recording) and a mic preamp with a gain range up to 75 dB. Also, Autoset and an AES port, which is useful for connecting one of the reference converters (ADI-2 *) and still having ADAT free for connecting additional devices (preamp, AD/DA converter).

Not included in this list are PCIe cards; the HDSPe MADI FX is the only PCIe card with a DSP supporting FX, RoomEQ, Crossfeed.

Thanks Ramses and waedi for the good answers. Ramses and thank you for your great work, I love your blog.

If you allow me one more question guys:
I know that babyface pro fs has its fixed filters on ad and da conversion, but do you think it could be implemented if Rme considered other settings, for example Linear, slow, etc.? Do you think it would be useful? Or it's useless. I just wondered why Adi2 pro fs has it and babyface doesn't. Thank you very much for the answer and for all the help.
PS:
One additional question occurred to me:
How do you like Da Babyface pro fs conversion? And if you own an Adi2 pro fs do you hear any difference between the two audio interfaces?
I really like Da conversion babyface pro fs and it seems that I can no longer hear through the fog, but the sound is really the same as it is in real life. Compared to my old third generation Scarlet 8i6 it was a wow effect for me when I bought my babyface pro fs about a month ago and I am very happy with it. I am better at mixing and making decisions. I hope it's not just placebo in my head.
Have a nice day and thanks again. I believe that my questions are not terible and that they will not bother you.

Babyface pro fs

1,474 (edited by vinark 2026-02-10 21:58:48)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

I own the babyface pro fs and love it's sound. As a music producer, for me, the different filters are only confusing. With what filter should I produce and how does that influence dicissions i make during mixing and mastering. For pure listening enjoyment I could just choose the filter that I like, if I heard any difference, which I don't know.
So for music production it makes more sense to have the most common filter.
But in all honesty, I have 3 generations of RME converters, starting with a ADI-8AE (very old) and I can work reliably with and enjoy all 3 generations. I never mis having the best when working on the oldest. But RME always goes for neutral and that they are.

Vincent, Amsterdam
https://soundcloud.com/thesecretworld
BFpro fs, 2X HDSP9652 ADI-8AE, 2X HDSP9632

1,475

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

This question was already answered by RME on this forum.

For recording interfaces, the standard filter, e.g. "Sharp" (UFX III) is used even if the converters support different filters - because it provides the most neutral, linear-phase response with predictable, well-measured behavior and minimal side effects. Alternative filters intentionally trade technical accuracy for subtle changes, which is why they are usually considered optional or application-specific rather than a default choice.

This is especially important for recording at single speed, where the treble rolloff in the audible band is audible.
The intention is not to ruin important recordings.

Use e.g. one of the reference converters for monitoring, there you can switch between filters.

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,476

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

vinark wrote:

I own the babyface pro fs and love it's sound. As a music producer, for me, the different filters are only confusing. With what filter should I produce and how does that influence dicissions i make during mixing and mastering. For pure listening enjoyment I could just choose the filter that I like, if I heard any difference, which I don't know.
So for music production it makes more sense to have the most common filter.
But in all honesty, I have 3 generations of RME converters, starting with a ADI-8AE (very old) and I can work reliably with and enjoy all 3 generations. I never mis having the best when working on the oldest. But RME always goes for neutral and that they are.

Thank you very much for your reply. WHAT you say makes sense. I was just curious. And can I ask if you can hear the difference in the D/A conversion via the ADI-8AE compared to the babyface pro fs? Do you feel Rme has moved on over the years? Sorry if my questions sound stupid, but I have never personally had another Rme converter, only now my Babyface pro fs. I'm a Rme newbie.

Babyface pro fs

1,477

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

ramses wrote:

This question was already answered by RME on this forum.

For recording interfaces, the standard filter, e.g. "Sharp" (UFX III) is used even if the converters support different filters - because it provides the most neutral, linear-phase response with predictable, well-measured behavior and minimal side effects. Alternative filters intentionally trade technical accuracy for subtle changes, which is why they are usually considered optional or application-specific rather than a default choice.

This is especially important for recording at single speed, where the treble rolloff in the audible band is audible.
The intention is not to ruin important recordings.

Use e.g. one of the reference converters for monitoring, there you can switch between filters.

Thanks Ramses for the qualified answer. It makes sense to me. I wish you all the best.

Babyface pro fs

1,478 (edited by vinark 2026-02-11 08:04:20)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

HenryNH6 wrote:
vinark wrote:

I own the babyface pro fs and love it's sound. As a music producer, for me, the different filters are only confusing. With what filter should I produce and how does that influence dicissions i make during mixing and mastering. For pure listening enjoyment I could just choose the filter that I like, if I heard any difference, which I don't know.
So for music production it makes more sense to have the most common filter.
But in all honesty, I have 3 generations of RME converters, starting with a ADI-8AE (very old) and I can work reliably with and enjoy all 3 generations. I never mis having the best when working on the oldest. But RME always goes for neutral and that they are.

Thank you very much for your reply. WHAT you say makes sense. I was just curious. And can I ask if you can hear the difference in the D/A conversion via the ADI-8AE compared to the babyface pro fs? Do you feel Rme has moved on over the years? Sorry if my questions sound stupid, but I have never personally had another Rme converter, only now my Babyface pro fs. I'm a Rme newbie.

The thing is I can not do double blind test. It is to complicated. When i got the babyface new  i thought it sounded a  bit better, more clear and spacious, but now a few years later, i work with the babyface and a hdsp9632 on 2 locations and even when working on the same projects I never mis anything or have the feeling it sounds suddenly less good when switching to the older device, so in reality without expectation bias they probably sound the same.
And btw your questions are far from stupid and you ask them in a nice way!

Vincent, Amsterdam
https://soundcloud.com/thesecretworld
BFpro fs, 2X HDSP9652 ADI-8AE, 2X HDSP9632

1,479

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

vinark wrote:
HenryNH6 wrote:
vinark wrote:

I own the babyface pro fs and love it's sound. As a music producer, for me, the different filters are only confusing. With what filter should I produce and how does that influence dicissions i make during mixing and mastering. For pure listening enjoyment I could just choose the filter that I like, if I heard any difference, which I don't know.
So for music production it makes more sense to have the most common filter.
But in all honesty, I have 3 generations of RME converters, starting with a ADI-8AE (very old) and I can work reliably with and enjoy all 3 generations. I never mis having the best when working on the oldest. But RME always goes for neutral and that they are.

Thank you very much for your reply. WHAT you say makes sense. I was just curious. And can I ask if you can hear the difference in the D/A conversion via the ADI-8AE compared to the babyface pro fs? Do you feel Rme has moved on over the years? Sorry if my questions sound stupid, but I have never personally had another Rme converter, only now my Babyface pro fs. I'm a Rme newbie.

The thing is I can not do double blind test. It is to complicated. When i got the babyface new  i thought it sounded a  bit better, more clear and spacious, but now a few years later, i work with the babyface and a hdsp9632 on 2 locations and even when working on the same projects I never mis anything or have the feeling it sounds suddenly less good when switching to the older device, so in reality without expectation bias they probably sound the same.
And btw your questions are far from stupid and you ask them in a nice way!

"Thank you very much for your reply and for the encouragement. I would hate to be cluttering this great forum with low-quality content.
Based on your feedback, it makes me think that it’s not just about the converters—which RME has always chosen very carefully—but clearly also about the op-amps and the overall circuit design.
Perhaps there is also a touch of psychoacoustics involved. I can back up your words with my own experience: when I first started using my new Babyface Pro FS, every song I had previously listened to on my old interface seemed more detailed, wider, and just had a 'fatter' sound. Now that my ears have adjusted, I sometimes feel like it sounds exactly as I remember it from my childhood, listening to those same tracks on an old CD player. So, I’m not sure to what extent it's just the mindset that 'RME must have high-quality converters' and how much of it is objective reality.
Of course, there are certain observations where the clarity of the D/A conversion is undeniable. Similarly, when recording vocals, the A/D conversion is noticeably better, not to mention the preamps, which are a major step up from my old Scarlett. I notice it especially when pushing a compressor hard—the vocal distortion is lower and the high frequencies are much smoother.
In any case, thank you once again for your excellent answers and for your kindness. Have a successful week!"

Babyface pro fs

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Hello, new Babyface Pro FS user here. I'm using it with an Arturia Fuse 8in ADAT expander to track drums mostly. Total Mix is....well...you know, lol. I spent several days with the manual and beginners video series before I received the unit and um welll....you know. I have no idea.

So here's my first question: I was unable to monitor anything, and not getting input to the mic inputs. I am getting playback signal and signal in both main and headphone outputs in Total Mix, but no sound. Until I turned on the Arturia, which had been cabled via ADAt to the Babyface the whole time, I just wasn't using it for my initial experiments. As soon as I turned it on I was able to monitor and get mic input signal from Babyface channel 1 and 2. Nothing is attached to the Arturia, but it seems to require turning it on if the optical cable is attached to the Babyface to get any monitoring. Is this normal? On my previous interface it didn't matter if the ADAT expander was turned on, and I just kept it attached whether I was using it or not.

1,481 (edited by waedi 2026-03-02 16:20:32)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Regarding the Adat ON/OFF : Please provide a screenshot of your driver settings Fireface USB Settings

For Totalmix handling, a little workshop :
Totalmix is a monitoring tool
Its all about bringing sound to an output
First question is :
On which output do i want to have my music ?
Example headphone
See, the bottom row faders in Totalmix, those are the outputs, hardware outputs on the interface.
AN1/2 analog outputs 1/2 XLR connectors
PH3/4 headphone output
AS 1/2 Adat or SPDIF optical toslink output
Adat 3/4 up to Adat 7/8 are the Adat outputs toslink optical socket
Now we want sound on the headphone, click on it.
Click into the field of the PH3/4 or move the fader a little bit, the output becomes highlighted, it is selected for receiving sound.
In the middle row you may see your signal from the DAW, lift the fader and hear the music in the headphone.
Thats it.
Click the desired output and lift faders from above.

M1-Tahoe, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Thank You for the response. I don't know how to attach screenshot of Fireface USB settings. But basically it's:

Babyface Pro (serial Number)
Firmware v322
Driver v3.223
Optical out ADAT
clock mode
sample rate 48000hz
Clock Source Internal (I tried both)
Input status
ADAT Sync 48kHz

I can see a playback signal from my DAW and in both main output and headphone output. But I can't actually hear anything unless my ADAT expander is both plugged in and turned on. Then it's fine. If ADAT is unplugged I get same results as having it turned off. Visual signals for daw playback, nothing for hardware inputs andcan not hear anything in headphones or mains. So it has to  be a setting of some sort or something needs to be rebooted perhaps?

1,483 (edited by waedi 2026-03-02 18:39:00)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

is your coputer too old for using a new driver ?

Also, is the output fader up ? Sorry for this dumb question, but sometimes the easiest things got overlooked.

M1-Tahoe, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Okay to reiterate and simplify my issue: I can get DAW output on software outputs and hardware outputs, both headphone and main, but can't hear anything. Or get any signal to mic inputs. Both of these issues are resolved if my ADAT expander is turned on. Even though I'm not running anything through it.

1,485

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

I have no explanation for this weird behavior.

I can only tell what I would do.

Disconnect any Adat and try to get music out of the headphones.
Reflashing the unit
install new driver 427

M1-Tahoe, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Yes my computer is using an older system for Mac 10.14.6 Mojave. It's old but works fine with the Babyface if the ADAT expander is turned on. I bought the unit partly to run on older computers, which is one of it's primary selling points. That and USB2.

1,487

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

And the Totalmix version is 1.99 ?

May you try a Total Reset.

M1-Tahoe, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Totalmix 1.97. That's what gets installed with the compatible driver etc... for my system. Not sure if I can upgrade Total Mix without upgrading the drivers etc...  I did a total reset and it didn't help. Output fader is up. Everything works great if ADAT is turned on. Which, thankfully is how I generally use it, but that may not always be the case.

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

"Can't hear anything" where exactly? What exactly is that ADAT device?

Regards
Daniel Fuchs
RME

1,490

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

So that is not normal behaviour. I don’t always turn on my adat expander and it never causes a problem.

Babyface Pro Fs, Behringer ADA8200, win 11 PCs, Cubase/Wavelab, Adam A7X monitors.

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Although I can see all software output signals going to main and headphone outputs, I can't hear anything through headphones or mains. I also can't get a signal to the microphone inputs channel one and two properly in Total Mix. Until I turn on my ADAT expander, Arturia Audiofuse 8 IN. AT that point both outputs and channel one/two inputs work. Everything works correctly, but only if the Arturia is turned on.

1,492

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Please try Totalmix 2.00 and perform a Total Reset.

Make sure the toslink cables are connected to the correct ports.
Input and output are the same plug so to mess-up these is easy to happen, altough there is no danger or issue by such.

Your interface has to work correct by its own before you add other equipment.

Disconnect all adat, make Total reset and use the new Totalmix, play music from computer and listen thru headphone output.

As soon this works fine, then start to add adat.

M1-Tahoe, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Installed 2.00 and did another Total reset. Try to play music from itunes and nothing.... Signal is visible in Total Mix but no sound. No optical cables are attached.

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

The Saga continues. I tried the Babyface on another computer 1 system up from the laptop I use for recording, so Mac Catalina, 10.15. I installed TotalMix 2 and tried listening to music. It worked. Also tried a midi instrument in Ableton and it also worked. No idea why it doesn't on the laptop. Unless I have the ADAT connected. Deeply strange....

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Solved. Taken most of the day but it works. It appears that it was the powered usb hub, somehow when ADAT in was plugged in and turned on, it possibly added some 'juice' to the powering of the Babyface that the powered hub lacked? Making it work.... Thank You all for your suggestions.

1,496

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Thanks for providing the outcome, interesting case...

M1-Tahoe, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,497

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Good to know. I always connect an audio interface direct without a hub.

Babyface Pro Fs, Behringer ADA8200, win 11 PCs, Cubase/Wavelab, Adam A7X monitors.

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

It was actually the cable, I believe. The usb cable that comes with the Babyface is not universally replaceable. The hub had nothing else attached, but I thought would help with powering the Babyface. Obviously I was wrong.

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

ADAT can't change the way the unit operates like this really... You still didn't mention what kind of ADAT device you are using...

Regards
Daniel Fuchs
RME

1,500 (edited by waedi 2026-03-03 16:11:50)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

In post 1480 he started

https://www.thomann.de/de/arturia_audiofuse_x8_in.htm

Turned out the power was connected to the same as the external power adapter of the BF.

Wonder what power adapter this is ?


Can a DC drop or lift have this effect on a running BF ?
Should be possible to reproduce with a DC Labornetzgerät

M1-Tahoe, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue