Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

The Behringer ADA8200 is the cheapest you can get. (44,1 or 48 kHz)

https://www.thomann.de/de/behringer_ada … ragain.htm

It is a great gear, it does just the job and I have one and be very happy with it.

For a bit more money you should look at Ferrofish, they are very popular.

Hi, thank you, you're absolutely right, in fact that's more or less what I'm looking for; I've seen these models.

https://www.thomann.es/ferrofish_pulse8_ae.htm (good option)
https://www.thomann.es/behringer_ada_8200_ultragain.htm
https://www.thomann.es/rme_adi_2_fs.htm
https://www.thomann.es/evo_sp8.htm

Thank you for your interest.

https://soundcloud.com/endocriner
Babyface pro fs, H110M-D rev.4211, W10, Bitwig 4.0.1, Adam A7

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

I use the Arturia 8in. Much better than the Berringer. Works flawlessly and sounds great. No preamps though, which is what I wanted as I already have several preamps.

https://www.thomann.es/arturia_audiofuse_x8_in.htm

This converter only has inputs; I want it to have outputs as well, but thank you.

Thanks

https://soundcloud.com/endocriner
Babyface pro fs, H110M-D rev.4211, W10, Bitwig 4.0.1, Adam A7

1,553

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

I also use the ada8200 and use all in and outs. Works great and always syncs up. I use the outs for a sub, cues, and to a headphone. Inputs all mics to mic a drum kit. Decent converters too.

Babyface Pro Fs, Behringer ADA8200, win 11 PCs, Cubase/Wavelab, Adam A7X monitors.

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

mkok wrote:

I also use the ada8200 and use all in and outs. Works great and always syncs up. I use the outs for a sub, cues, and to a headphone. Inputs all mics to mic a drum kit. Decent converters too.

Excellent, what subwoofer do you use?

https://soundcloud.com/endocriner
Babyface pro fs, H110M-D rev.4211, W10, Bitwig 4.0.1, Adam A7

1,555

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

endocriner wrote:
mkok wrote:

I also use the ada8200 and use all in and outs. Works great and always syncs up. I use the outs for a sub, cues, and to a headphone. Inputs all mics to mic a drum kit. Decent converters too.

Excellent, what subwoofer do you use?

It’s one I built from a kit. I’m in the uk and the company was IPL. They no longer exist as it was one guy and he retired a couple of years ago. I’ve had the sub for about 25 years. I’ve only started using it again after putting a new surround on the driver as it had disintegrated.

Babyface Pro Fs, Behringer ADA8200, win 11 PCs, Cubase/Wavelab, Adam A7X monitors.

1,556

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Hi - I have a Babyface Pro FS connected to my Mac Studio. The audio is regularly interrupted, like maybe the driver has briefly crashed. It especially happens when the machine is loaded. This is the third or fourth audio interface I've had, and I've never had this problem with any others. I just updated the driver (and OS) and it is still happening.

I assume this is not expected behavior and that others aren't experiencing it.

Any recommendations for how I might debug?

Thanks.

1,557

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

technoiswatchingyou wrote:

Hi, folks!

I literally ready to kill myself because of the problem:
I can't route signal from Babyface Pro FS's instr. 3/4 inputs into DAW to record the signal that going to the inputs.

So... My device is going into instr. 3/4 inputs. I can hear the signal thru my headphones that connected to Babyface Pro.
Also I can hear the signal from DAW when some VSTs are playing.

What I'm doing wrong? I think that I googled everything that I can find :/

Live settings:
https://i.ibb.co/3VqX8Xr/Screenshot-2026-03-04-at-01-00-54.png
https://i.ibb.co/KpJWM2j0/Frame-632125.png

Total Mix:
https://i.ibb.co/tMmmtX3s/Screenshot-2026-03-04-at-01-02-37.png

If you want your DAW to "override" totalmix routint, set TM to "DAW mode" in options/operational mode. if you are on mac don´t forget to let Live to access your mic.

1,558

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

would someone point me to some video, or tutorial, about proper gain staging on the Hi-z inputs. Simple, to the point pragmatic stuff.


Also, a yes or no is enough, can I use Totalmix to route a signal seamlessly on Babyface, like with the FireFace. I want to create a bus from the mono  analog inputs to a digital stereo pair, to monitor my guitar in stereo.

thanks, in advance.

1,559

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

yes

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,560 (edited by ramses 2026-06-23 18:49:04)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Every output has an individual submix.
You can route any input channel and software playback channel (audio from the computer) to an HW output.

This thread gives you an overview and leads you to different sources of information:
https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.php?id=34394

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,561

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

I installed driver 4.3 over 3.39 on a Babyface Pro Fs running 3.22 firmware, I installed too Totalmix 2.03. i have the permissions for RME to run on the background. My machine is a MacBook Pro M5pro, Tahoe 26.51.
it stopped working, the firefac e USB settings defaults to 32kh, and the apps including totalmix don´t see the interface.

Also the Class Compliant headphone out isn´t showing up, or else I would have my problem solved.


Any ideas? thanks in advance.

1,562

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

stagx wrote:

Also the Class Compliant headphone out isn´t showing up, or else I would have my problem solved.


Try output channels 3/4 those should be the headphone

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,563

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

waedi wrote:
stagx wrote:

Also the Class Compliant headphone out isn´t showing up, or else I would have my problem solved.


Try output channels 3/4 those should be the headphone

thanks, only shows 1, and 2.

BTW, gemini took care of the issues. it was fun,. for a guy that comes from windows, it was a walk down memory lane. in fact, that´s what 2026, on computer related issue looks like.

1,564

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

If you switch off CC-mode and connect the interface to the Mac normal-mode and open the Audio-Midi-Setup, what does it show ?
Does the Fireface USB Setting open ?
Does Totalmix open ?

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,565 (edited by stagx 2026-06-24 15:34:31)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

waedi wrote:

If you switch off CC-mode and connect the interface to the Mac normal-mode and open the Audio-Midi-Setup, what does it show ?
Does the Fireface USB Setting open ?
Does Totalmix open ?

The answer to everyone having problems installing 4.3 USB drivers on Tahoe, over 3.39, a total uninstallation of 3.39 has to be in place.
the link from Gemini tells how:
https://gemini.google.com/share/f7f632611aa3

1,566

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

To everyone who wants to install a driver software from RME :
There is a readme text file in the download folder with each driver. Read it and follow it.

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,567

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Do we get the S-Gear, and BX plugins, after registering BFP fs? or the deal is off?

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

This was only ever applicable on the US or North American market, check with the local distributor there if that's where you are.

Regards
Daniel Fuchs
RME

1,569

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

waedi wrote:
stagx wrote:

Also the Class Compliant headphone out isn´t showing up, or else I would have my problem solved.


Try output channels 3/4 those should be the headphone

these outputs don´t show on Cubase macOS, but shows those on AUM iOS. Not showing on Genome iOS.
I can´t figure out how this happens, if it´s only me, or if it happens to other people, and if it has a solution.

1,570

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

May you provide a screenshot of the Audio-Midi-Setup ?

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,571 (edited by stagx 2026-06-27 22:09:41)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

waedi wrote:

May you provide a screenshot of the Audio-Midi-Setup ?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-zG_5R … drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a3zfCF … drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1l8BiRX … drive_link




1ST RME Drivers full routing on Cubase Studio Setup
2nd Cubase out visible ports on Class Compliant Audio Connections
3rd. Cubase total Class Compliant I/O on Studio Setup

on iOS, as I told you before, this issue happens in some apps and hosts too. others the total analog outs show on the settings page.


Also, isn´t it possible to trim the gain of the hi-z input, or is it me, and AI, that are missing something?

1,572 (edited by waedi 2026-06-28 01:37:14)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Post 1565
You bring up driver installation, but now you bring screenshots with class compliant connection issues.

You did not answer previous questions.

If Copy-mode is enabled, disable it for a test, see page 91 in the user manual.

The Audio-Midi-Setup is an application in MacOS not part of Cubase.


Please switch the unit into normal-mode not CC-mode.

Use the interface normal as it is made for together with Totalmix.

And here is the gain setting for the instrument inputs
https://i.ibb.co/84RScQ3L/gain.jpg

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,573 (edited by stagx 2026-06-28 10:11:27)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

waedi wrote:

Post 1565
You bring up driver installation, but now you bring screenshots with class compliant connection issues.

You did not answer previous questions.

If Copy-mode is enabled, disable it for a test, see page 91 in the user manual.

The Audio-Midi-Setup is an application in MacOS not part of Cubase.


Please switch the unit into normal-mode not CC-mode.

Use the interface normal as it is made for together with Totalmix.




And here is the gain setting for the instrument inputs
https://i.ibb.co/84RScQ3L/gain.jpg

I´d had to choose Class Compliant because I failed to install 4.3 drivers, I had work to do, I was doing over the phones, But thank AI, not anybody else, I managed to install them correctly, and back to work. Nevertheless it doesn´t explain why I miss my class compliant phones out, namely in iOS, because there I have no alternative to use any other drivers but CC. And, I have two phones out, and none working.

Furthermore I asked if there is a way of trimming the Hi-Z input, which obviously, no one can do it without resourcing to some DI, because there is no way to do it in TM, as it only adds more gain.
So, unless one turns down the guitar volume down, and mess with the guitar tone doing so, the monitoring is done without clipping in your dreams.

    IMO, that´s a major flaw in the circuitry. no one wants clipping, or use line inputs, instead of Hi-Z because that alter the tone too, even transients of the guitar signal.

so what´s your role here, besides stringing people along?
You gave no solution, neither explain the philosophy behind this unorthodox behavior of handling the audio path.

1,574 (edited by Kubrak 2026-06-28 22:18:33)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

I am not on Apple. Maybe that there is no signal in headphones as they are 3/4 and iOS outputs to 1/2 which is "main out". People using iOS would know better....

Concerning the guitar input. If signal is too hot from amplyfier/effect, you do not need  DI, attenuator would do. Something like for example this.
https://www.tritonaudio.com/product/airhead/

FF UCX II, Digiface USB, Babyface Pro FS

1,575 (edited by waedi 2026-06-28 19:39:45)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

stagx wrote:

there is no way to do it in TM, as it only adds more gain.
So, unless one turns down the guitar volume down, and mess with the guitar tone doing so, the monitoring is done without clipping in your dreams.

My previous post was not helpful for you, sorry for that I didn't understand your gain setting issue.

In the past there was a lot customers complaining weak guitar signal, not enough gain.
RME did firmware and Totalmix update and added Boost as a new reference level setting.

There are three settings you should try all of them for testing

https://i.ibb.co/Ngk5QFFX/boost.png

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,576

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

waedi wrote:
stagx wrote:

there is no way to do it in TM, as it only adds more gain.
So, unless one turns down the guitar volume down, and mess with the guitar tone doing so, the monitoring is done without clipping in your dreams.

My previous post was not helpful for you, sorry for that I didn't understand your gain setting issue.

In the past there was a lot customers complaining weak guitar signal, not enough gain.
RME did firmware and Totalmix update and added Boost as a new reference level setting.


There are three settings you should try all of them for testing

https://i.ibb.co/Ngk5QFFX/boost.png



    Once, I referenced those selections. I choose -10 because it´s supposed to be a Hi-Z input, should be like a real amp, completely oblivious of my pickup output, and then, on TM, I´m supposed to boost it so I don´t starve the converters, and subtract on my recording gear the exact same amount, so the structure of the signal keeps its integrity, and the Ampsims could do their job of simulating an amp.

     Again, I think there is a methodology behind that goes way over my head. Because i don´t need boosting, and if I have to use the +4db line attenuation, i only can do it "properly" with a DI feeding the interface.

    Notice, I´m not saying the interface is wrong. I´m saying I don´t understand its gain structure, and it´s not appropriate for modern active, or high output passive guitars, as it is. And, if I noticed before buying I wouldn´t keep it for myself.

    I guess others tolerate that behavior or found out a way to work with it. the only solution I got was to back off a little the guitar volume knob, but sometimes i want to have it fully on, and i can´t do it without compromises.

1,577

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

never heard of "high output passive guitar" 
I use an LTD with active EMG pickups, no issue with recording levels

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,578

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Using guitars with Gibson Classic Humbuckers.

In the past I used UFX+, UFX III, now 12Mic's Instr inputs.
When I look at my 12Mics Inst input settings, then I am using 21 dB gain on the Instr input.
Min and max gain settings are 8 and 50 dB.
So I can lower the Instr gain by 13 dB (to 8) and increase it by 29 dB (to 50).

The Gibson classic Humbuckers are good/standard passive pickups, which are not too hot
and were used with most premium rock and jazz guitars from the custom shop (Les Paul, 335, Byrdland, L-5).
Single Coil pickups need additional 2-3 dB gain.

I am not sure how hot your guitars are.
Wondering that it does not fit with the Babyface, maybe the specs are different.

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,579 (edited by stagx 2026-06-29 12:25:44)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

waedi wrote:

never heard of "high output passive guitar" 
I use an LTD with active EMG pickups, no issue with recording levels

You Never heard of Bill Lawrence, or Gibson T495? but, I have more passive humbuckers, sending the signal thru the roof. in Fact, a modest SD Pearly Gates on single coil shape, or the SD Full Shred, considered a medium output pickup, are doing it.
Since they are humbuckers I can´t lower them height that much, or they stop sounding at all.

1,580

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

ramses wrote:

Using guitars with Gibson Classic Humbuckers.

In the past I used UFX+, UFX III, now 12Mic's Instr inputs.
When I look at my 12Mics Inst input settings, then I am using 21 dB gain on the Instr input.
Min and max gain settings are 8 and 50 dB.
So I can lower the Instr gain by 13 dB (to 8) and increase it by 29 dB (to 50).

The Gibson classic Humbuckers are good/standard passive pickups, which are not too hot
and were used with most premium rock and jazz guitars from the custom shop (Les Paul, 335, Byrdland, L-5).
Single Coil pickups need additional 2-3 dB gain.

I am not sure how hot your guitars are.
Wondering that it does not fit with the Babyface, maybe the specs are different.

Thanks, but I believe that´s what I wante to do on BabyFace, being able to set the gain myself, but it seems to be locked to -10, the supposed DI input, +4, the line input, and another with a Db boost.

I came from a Zen Q, and I set the gain as you set on the UFXs, and 12 micpre. the exact figures were around 12 or 30 db boosting, with clean signal, then I did the math on Cubase inputs and take off the same amount I gave previously.

that´s my workflow, the guitars sound great, volume is nice, but I want to be in control.

   however, even if the clipping wasn´t happening the signal seems to be boosted, I want to know if that perception is wrong or right, and what´s the amount of the boosting, so I can give my software the correct information.

1,581 (edited by ramses 2026-06-29 13:38:52)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

I checked the specs of Babyface Pro FS, UCX II, 802 FS, UFX III, 12Mic.

I think you are right, stagx, the Babyface Pro FS instrument input alone doesn't seem to be the best solution for your guitar with some hotter Humbuckers.

Look at the maximum input levels of the Instr inputs at @0 gain:
- Babyface Pro FS: +13 dBu
- UCX II: +13 dBu
- 12Mic: +18 dBu
- 802 FS: +21 dBu
- UFX II/III: +21 dBu

Since you probably don't want to switch to an 802 FS or UFX II, the only alternatives for you are:
- using a D/I box
- lowering the output volume of your guitar

I would recommend using an active D/I box connected to the mic/line input 1-2 via XLR. With PAD activated, this gives you a +19 dBu maximum input level, significantly more headroom than the instrument input 3-4 with +13 dBu. A passive D/I box would not work well here, as the mic input impedance of only 2 kOhm would load down the pickup and cause high-frequency loss.

I would take a look at products like Palmer PAN 02 (or PAN 02 Pro) or Radial J48.

The PAN 02 will be sufficient. The Pro version has additional features like extra boost, that you won't need in your case of already having too high an output level. But the switchable attenuator might be practical.

All products support phantom power. The Radial needs phantom power and has no battery option.

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,582

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

ramses wrote:

I checked the specs of Babyface Pro FS, UCX II, 802 FS, UFX III, 12Mic.

I think you are right, stagx, the Babyface Pro FS instrument input alone doesn't seem to be the best solution for your guitar with some hotter Humbuckers.

Look at the maximum input levels of the Instr inputs at @0 gain:
- Babyface Pro FS: +13 dBu
- UCX II: +13 dBu
- 12Mic: +18 dBu
- 802 FS: +21 dBu
- UFX II/III: +21 dBu

Since you probably don't want to switch to an 802 FS or UFX II, the only alternatives for you are:
- using a D/I box
- lowering the output volume of your guitar

I would recommend using an active D/I box connected to the mic/line input 1-2 via XLR. With PAD activated, this gives you a +19 dBu maximum input level, significantly more headroom than the instrument input 3-4 with +13 dBu. A passive D/I box would not work well here, as the mic input impedance of only 2 kOhm would load down the pickup and cause high-frequency loss.

I would take a look at products like Palmer PAN 02 (or PAN 02 Pro) or Radial J48.

The PAN 02 will be sufficient. The Pro version has additional features like extra boost, that you won't need in your case of already having too high an output level. But the switchable attenuator might be practical.

All products support phantom power. The Radial needs phantom power and has no battery option.


     Thank you, I tried with a passive DI on the mic input, and i´m able to set the adequate gain levels for my setup, with plenty headroom.

     But, mysteriously, the Hi-z input on the Babyface seems to be more "conventional" now, for the lack of better words, but with limited headroom.

     I didn´t test yet any active PUs, perhaps things get better. I don´t set aside myself doing mistakes, since it is a sophisticated piece of equipment with some learning curve.

    incidentally, the guys where I shop the interface messaged me asking how am I liking the interface, I´m going to tell them what´s happening. I´m a little frustrated because I can´t believe this lack of headroom.   

     Those interfaces you recommended are overkill to my setup, I already have enough i/o for a rock band, that´s all I need. But, I´m willing to investigate further the RME lineup. I already own a Fireface the original 800, and Totalmix left great memories.

1,583 (edited by ramses 2026-06-30 08:57:46)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Sorry, I do not understand the issue now with the passive D/I box.

You say with the passive D/I Box
a) "I am able to set adequate gain levels." What concrete gain levels on which analog input (1, 2, 3, 4)?
b) It "sounds conventional" with "limited headroom".
     What is the limitation? Please detail the metering; what average and peak levels do you see?

That you can set an adequate gain level and be limited with headroom sounds like a contradiction.
You have to deliver more details; see a) and b) to better explain what you mean, and to get a clue about what the problem is.

What passive D/I box do you use?

Please note three important points:

1. You should better use an active D/I box because a passive one will most likely impact higher frequencies of the signal
https://www.thomann.de/de/palmer_pan_02.htm €66

2. You need to connect the D/I Box to either Analog 1 or 2 IN, NOT (!!) 3+4, as 3+4 are limited to a max input level of +13 dBu at gain 0

3. You need to activate PAD on Analog 1 or 2 IN; otherwise, you won't get the max input level of +19 dBu!!!

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,584 (edited by stagx 2026-06-30 12:02:23)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

ramses wrote:

Sorry, I do not understand the issue now with the passive D/I box.

You say with the passive D/I Box
a) "I am able to set adequate gain levels." What concrete gain levels on which analog input (1, 2, 3, 4)?
b) It "sounds conventional" with "limited headroom".
     What is the limitation? Please detail the metering; what average and peak levels do you see?

That you can set an adequate gain level and be limited with headroom sounds like a contradiction.
You have to deliver more details; see a) and b) to better explain what you mean, and to get a clue about what the problem is.

What passive D/I box do you use?

Please note three important points:

1. You should better use an active D/I box because a passive one will most likely impact higher frequencies of the signal
https://www.thomann.de/de/palmer_pan_02.htm €66

2. You need to connect the D/I Box to either Analog 1 or 2 IN, NOT (!!) 3+4, as 3+4 are limited to a max input level of +13 dBu at gain 0

3. You need to activate PAD on Analog 1 or 2 IN; otherwise, you won't get the max input level of +19 dBu!!!

I’m using a cheap passive DI on input 1, I tried both with the pad on and off, no clipping on either setting, so I kept going with the pad off, and I rose the gain 35db without clipping.

     Then I got back to try the BFP Hi-z, and no headroom, but it didn’t clip, it might be because I was playing fingerstyle, or using less strength plucking. I don’t think the DI could have any interference on this scenario.


      This morning I went back at it, the pad seems to muffle the sound, I´m not quite sure if it just lowers it, but it feels like a slight roll off on the guitar volume, taking out the poisonous frequencies that might set back rhythm playing to a uncontrollable mess, but sometimes I like it fully open.Frankly, most of the times, as I might dial down the gain on the software I´m using. The hi-z input returned to its behavior, it shows clipping every time i hit the strings harder, and on the lower strings most of the time, both on +4dbu, or -10dbv. They sound both quite well, but clipping shows its ugly face. nevertheless, rarely the green goes past 22db, but then the red starts to warn me about clipping.

I wonder, am I right, are the meters right? but that shouldn´t be an issue, when I purchased the BFP, I thought I was buying into no problem, straightforward flexible setup. Until now, that´s not the case.

I heard the Hi-z input lack of headroom was by request of the forum members, and done with a firmware update. It doesn´t seem they thought it well enough.



Thanks for your concern and advice.

1,585

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Did you try the input reference level +4dBu ?

It is still Hi-z input but the input gain stage is different.

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,586

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

waedi wrote:

Did you try the input reference level +4dBu ?

It is still Hi-z input but the input gain stage is different.


Yes, my previous interface supported +20db input, versus the +13db of the BFP. The input clips at the +4db setting, not as much but it clips, I was considering using that option. But this an obvious downgrade of my signal path. I already contacted the seller. I have no more issues with the BFP.

BTW, every interface on this price bracket, or format, like the UltraLite, Symponhy Duet 3, Apollos have such limitation, it seems they are not targeting guitar players, with modern high gain pickups. The exceptions are very scarce.

1,587 (edited by waedi 2026-06-30 14:51:36)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

An attenuator would be helpful ? Unfortunately they are mostly XLR

https://thumbs.static-thomann.de/thumb/padthumb600x600/pics/bdb/_43/436200/13120196_800.jpg

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,588 (edited by ramses 2026-06-30 16:20:37)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Thanks for the update, but this still doesn't give the data needed to identify the actual problem.

"Cheap passive DI" is not a product specification; brand and model are needed to evaluate the actual output impedance and level characteristics.

Also, your test method is not valid. Fingerstyle/light playing produces lower transient peaks than hard picking, palm-muted chugging, or hard attack on the low E string. If you want to find the real headroom limit of an input, you have to test with the technique that produces your highest peaks, not whichever technique happens not to clip.
And you need one setup/setting, not per play style, so that you have the full dynamic for your playing at any time without having to fear whether you come into clipping.

Please run one clean, defined test:
- DI box output (balanced) → Analog 1 IN via XLR
- Gain: 0 dB
- PAD: ON
- Play your hardest-hitting technique (pick attack, low E, palm-mute chugging)
- Read the peak level in TotalMix, in dBFS, peak meter, not RMS/average, since RMS hides exactly the transients that cause clipping.

Report back the actual peak dBFS value from this specific configuration. Without that number, no one can tell you whether you have a real headroom problem or whether the settings simply aren't targeted correctly.

Thanks.

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,589 (edited by stagx 2026-07-01 17:51:20)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

ramses wrote:

Thanks for the update, but this still doesn't give the data needed to identify the actual problem.

"Cheap passive DI" is not a product specification; brand and model are needed to evaluate the actual output impedance and level characteristics.

Also, your test method is not valid. Fingerstyle/light playing produces lower transient peaks than hard picking, palm-muted chugging, or hard attack on the low E string. If you want to find the real headroom limit of an input, you have to test with the technique that produces your highest peaks, not whichever technique happens not to clip.
And you need one setup/setting, not per play style, so that you have the full dynamic for your playing at any time without having to fear whether you come into clipping.

Please run one clean, defined test:
- DI box output (balanced) → Analog 1 IN via XLR
- Gain: 0 dB
- PAD: ON
- Play your hardest-hitting technique (pick attack, low E, palm-mute chugging)
- Read the peak level in TotalMix, in dBFS, peak meter, not RMS/average, since RMS hides exactly the transients that cause clipping.

Report back the actual peak dBFS value from this specific configuration. Without that number, no one can tell you whether you have a real headroom problem or whether the settings simply aren't targeted correctly.

Thanks.

on the mic input, connected with a DI i have no issues at all, whatever style i play, I have plenty headroom. But, my issue is with BFP DI absence of headroom, and, honestly, is it me, or did someone else noticed. How did they dealt with the issue within the interface mixer and hardware? Was it like that before? one of the members told it was asked to be like this by forum members.

1,590 (edited by ramses 2026-07-01 18:50:39)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

What do you mean by BFP "DI-Box"? Do you mean the Instrument ("Hi-Z") Input on Analog 3+4 IN?
As I told you already, the Instrument input on the BBF Pro FS supports only a maximum input level of +13 dBu.

If this is not sufficient for your guitar setup, then you have to
- work with the DI box like you did, which works or
- alternatively try another recording interface like 802 FS, UFX II or UFX III,
  which all support up to +21 dBu max input level on the Instr input.

> Was it like that before? one of the members told it was asked to be like this by forum members.

Sorry, I don't know. All that I can tell is that the devices follow the published specs; see the manual.

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,591 (edited by waedi 2026-07-01 23:01:14)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

This was referring to the "Boost" reference level setting which was added after requests from many users who complained to have weak guitar signal.

No one could think there will be a user who complains the other way around. Using the XLR input instead of the jack socket should solve the problem by enabling the PAD in the input channel.
A DI box is the proper way to get from jack guitar cable to XLR cable.

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,592 (edited by ramses 2026-07-01 23:29:58)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

waedi wrote:

A DI box is the proper way to get from jack guitar cable to XLR cable.

A DI box does more than just adapt the connector from TS (jack) to XLR.
It converts the unbalanced instrument signal to a balanced one, matches impedance,
and attenuates the signal to mic level.
It also suppresses ground loops and hum and protects the instrument from +48V phantom power.

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,593

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

The fault is mine, for not reading specs thoroughly, not the Hi-Z input. Lesson learned.

Thanks.

1,594 (edited by ramses 2026-07-02 12:27:02)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

stagx wrote:

The fault is mine, for not reading specs thoroughly, not the Hi-Z input. Lesson learned.

Thanks.

Well, the Babyface Pro is a mobile bus-powered device.

I wouldn't describe it as a fault because many guitarists use the BBF Pro FS with its Instr input.
The problem here is IMHO that you are using such hot PUs.

My preference is to use more balanced PUs like Gibson Classic '57, which sound more organic (you hear more of the guitar sound) and to shape the sound with a pedal or within the virtual amp.

You still have the possibility to use a D/I box, which is a valid solution, not only a "workaround".
You confirmed it yourself: "On the mic input, connected with a DI i have no issues at all, whatever style i play, I have plenty headroom. "

There, I think you are possibly making a mistake by using a passive D/I box.
I wouldn't wonder if you have some treble loss.

I would get an active D/I box, which is recommended in your setup to avoid this treble loss.
https://www.thomann.de/de/palmer_pan_02.htm for only €66; that's really not too expensive.

BR Ramses - HDSPe MADI FX, M-1620 Pro D, 12Mic, UFX III, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, Nuendo 15, Win10 IoT Ent

1,595

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

I have an unusual question. I am considering a Babyface Pro FS. I’d like to use it as a travel interface and then switch it to being an ADAT expander to add 4 extra channels to Metric Halo system at home. My question is - can it work in standalone mode as an expander itself, or does it only accept expanders? Are there going to be driver conflicts? I asked on the facebook group and got mixed responses as to whether this will work or not, so I figured I should double check here. I would think the standalone mode would include this capability.

1,596

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

In standalone it has no 8-channel-ADAT the optical port is reduced to stereo, only Adat channels 1/2 will work.

So it can be a standalone expander for 2 analog inputs XLR mic and two analog Line outputs XLR.

In standalone-mode there are no driver conflicts as there is no computer involved.

And further Adat expanders are not useful in standalone-mode because of the "only 2 channels"

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,597

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Thanks! So if I keep it connected to the computer, I'll get the extra line ins - but will there be driver conflicts, or will it work?

1,598

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

You did not tell about the computer.
On a Mac you create an aggregate device and it will work together with the other gear.
On Windows it is different.

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

1,599 (edited by froghawk 2026-07-31 16:13:00)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

Right, but I'm trying to do this directly through the MH units and not the computer - lower latency that way - and hopefully get all 4 inputs. So can I have it connected to the computer and route all 4 through the ADAT out?

1,600 (edited by waedi 2026-08-01 05:44:59)

Re: The official Babyface Pro Thread

It needs a working driver to recognize the unit by the computer and allow Totalmix to work on the unit.

You have to use Totalmix for routing input signals to the outputs.
With the exception when the unit is set to DAW-mode, a DAW can do the routing instead of Totalmix, but this will increase latency a lot and is cumbersome, learn to use Totalmix and you will be happy.

On Mac no problem on Windows more difficult when another audio driver is in use at the same time.

M1-GoldenGate, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue