Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

ramses wrote:

sounds good


Actually this idea was inspired by KaiS's post https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.ph … 21#p161721

And i think it would be nice if we can set a ceiling output level.

Pacifist, dumb, not stupid
Listen music out from a box which sounds
Reading words on paper/ screen

302

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

Disable AutoRef and set a lower Ref Level. Fully succificent if such a 'safety feature' is required.

Regards
Matthias Carstens
RME

303 (edited by KaiS 2021-08-09 07:33:13)

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

MC wrote:

Disable AutoRef and set a lower Ref Level. Fully succificent if such a 'safety feature' is required.

Or even better:

Use passive attenuators after ADI-2 to fit and limit the output level:
https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.ph … 42#p120442

These do not cost much and this solution is superior to an internal limit, in every regard.

304 (edited by Johannes AU 2021-08-09 09:33:24)

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

MC wrote:

Disable AutoRef and set a lower Ref Level. Fully succificent if such a 'safety feature' is required.


Agree and understood, this requested feature is not a must :-)

User should observe the output level safe to downstream equipment.

Pacifist, dumb, not stupid
Listen music out from a box which sounds
Reading words on paper/ screen

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

A couple of points for me.

1) Show USB levels on Global Level Meter top screen.

2) Allow SRC to be enabled in DAC mode to fix digital output sample rate.

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

10 band parametric EQ (not included bass/treble)

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

sberry2018 wrote:

10 band parametric EQ (not included bass/treble)

It's been confirmed many times in this thread that will never happen.

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

badboygolf16v wrote:
sberry2018 wrote:

10 band parametric EQ (not included bass/treble)

It's been confirmed many times in this thread that will never happen.

I just searched and saw nothing by MC in this thread.

Confirmed by who?

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

I was sure I read that there are not enough DSP resources, maybe I'm wrong.

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

badboygolf16v wrote:

I was sure I read that there are not enough DSP resources, maybe I'm wrong.

No problem. This is why we need to check.

If it is a general user commenting or official word by MC from RME.

311 (edited by KaiS 2021-08-29 00:40:48)

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

The 10 band of PEQ request comes into fashion because of the AutoEQ project I think.
https://github.com/jaakkopasanen/AutoEq … er/results

But - if you have a closer look you see, the primary 5 bands now can be used independently.
The secondary 5 bands do just minor tweaks that are specific to the single specimen measured and don’t make sense to be transferred to a different  sample.

If 5 bands of fully parametric EQ can’t fix it, 10 likely don’t help either.

Anyway the discussion likely is fruitless - “not enough resources left for more bands” is the estimated answer.

312

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

Could really low Q, as low as 0.1, be enabled at least for shelf filters in the EQ and bass/treble?

The use case for this would be to set a constant, slow roll-off that does not actually flatten out in the audible range. Q 0.5 is still too steep for that.

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

Love my RME ADI-2 fs

Would love it even more if it could communicate with my PC and send a text file with all my input settings.

Then I could see where I've gone wrong to correct them. It's harder when you're older, to look for mistakes on the screen.

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

johnhallkenney wrote:

Love my RME ADI-2 fs

Would love it even more if it could communicate with my PC and send a text file with all my input settings.

Then I could see where I've gone wrong to correct them. It's harder when you're older, to look for mistakes on the screen.

This has been discussed before, more than once actually. It's impossible to do with current hardware.

315

Re: RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests

Not sure if this has been suggested before but an optional peak hold for the spectral analyzer like in DigiCheck would be great.