You are not logged in. Please login or register.
RME User Forum → ADI-2 Pro & ADI-2 DAC → RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests
sounds good
Actually this idea was inspired by KaiS's post https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.ph … 21#p161721
And i think it would be nice if we can set a ceiling output level.
Disable AutoRef and set a lower Ref Level. Fully succificent if such a 'safety feature' is required.
Disable AutoRef and set a lower Ref Level. Fully succificent if such a 'safety feature' is required.
Or even better:
Use passive attenuators after ADI-2 to fit and limit the output level:
https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.ph … 42#p120442
These do not cost much and this solution is superior to an internal limit, in every regard.
Disable AutoRef and set a lower Ref Level. Fully succificent if such a 'safety feature' is required.
Agree and understood, this requested feature is not a must :-)
User should observe the output level safe to downstream equipment.
A couple of points for me.
1) Show USB levels on Global Level Meter top screen.
2) Allow SRC to be enabled in DAC mode to fix digital output sample rate.
10 band parametric EQ (not included bass/treble)
10 band parametric EQ (not included bass/treble)
It's been confirmed many times in this thread that will never happen.
sberry2018 wrote:10 band parametric EQ (not included bass/treble)
It's been confirmed many times in this thread that will never happen.
I just searched and saw nothing by MC in this thread.
Confirmed by who?
I was sure I read that there are not enough DSP resources, maybe I'm wrong.
I was sure I read that there are not enough DSP resources, maybe I'm wrong.
No problem. This is why we need to check.
If it is a general user commenting or official word by MC from RME.
The 10 band of PEQ request comes into fashion because of the AutoEQ project I think.
https://github.com/jaakkopasanen/AutoEq … er/results
But - if you have a closer look you see, the primary 5 bands now can be used independently.
The secondary 5 bands do just minor tweaks that are specific to the single specimen measured and don’t make sense to be transferred to a different sample.
If 5 bands of fully parametric EQ can’t fix it, 10 likely don’t help either.
Anyway the discussion likely is fruitless - “not enough resources left for more bands” is the estimated answer.
Could really low Q, as low as 0.1, be enabled at least for shelf filters in the EQ and bass/treble?
The use case for this would be to set a constant, slow roll-off that does not actually flatten out in the audible range. Q 0.5 is still too steep for that.
Love my RME ADI-2 fs
Would love it even more if it could communicate with my PC and send a text file with all my input settings.
Then I could see where I've gone wrong to correct them. It's harder when you're older, to look for mistakes on the screen.
Love my RME ADI-2 fs
Would love it even more if it could communicate with my PC and send a text file with all my input settings.
Then I could see where I've gone wrong to correct them. It's harder when you're older, to look for mistakes on the screen.
This has been discussed before, more than once actually. It's impossible to do with current hardware.
Not sure if this has been suggested before but an optional peak hold for the spectral analyzer like in DigiCheck would be great.
RME User Forum → ADI-2 Pro & ADI-2 DAC → RME ADI-2 DAC/Pro FS: Feature Requests
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.