weme wrote:Interesting test:
But it would probably have been carried out by some other people as well. I asked about it. The reason given was the design of the X-PSU.
In the ADI-2 DAC, a negative voltage is blocked by a diode. The ADI-2 DAC was therefore operated with a pulsating DC voltage: approx. 18 V max. with a frequency of 25 or 30 Hz (1/2 of mains frequency).
This is not exactly true.
There’s no series diode in ADI-2’s power supply input.
For reverse polarity protection, it’s a shunting diode that quasi short-circuits the negative halfwave of the X-PSU’s AC voltage.
The only reason that nothing broke is that the X-PSU luckily is too weak to either kill the diode or itself.
JPS70 wrote:I have an old Musical Fidelity X-PSU and I'd like to use it to power the ADI-2 DAC.
weme wrote:An X-PSU (only toroidal transformer) could drive an ADI-2 DAC via an AC-DC linear regulator (output approx. 10V).
Would mean building a full-fletched DC PSU:
Transformer (e.g. X-PSU) - full wave rectifier - load capacitor - Linear Regulator like an L78S12 or better.
Can be done if you are an electronics guy, but what for (see below)?
If you handle mains voltage you must be educated for this (not by Youtube-video!), or you will kill yourself or others, with all legal consequences.
This starts when you open the case of the X-PSU:
No user serviceable parts inside!
Remark regarding toroidal transformers,
compared to e.g. EI-Core-transformers:
Toroidals are indeed beneficial for Speaker Power Amplifiers with unregulated PSUs, as they deliver more stable voltage under high load, like strong bass pulses.
This can’t be generalized for (low power) regulated PSU’s like needed for ADI-2, as the voltage regulation decouples the transformer and it’s effects from the load.
Toroidal transformer based PSU’s even have there downsides, like producing more diode switching noise in the mains.