25% more bits would also lead to an increase in bandwidth during transmission between the recording interface and the PC.
Ultimately the PC would also have a higher load, as you can already see with other things like increasing the sample rate.
Regarding Dynamic:
24 bits already allow a dynamic range of about 144 dB, if I googled that correctly, which is already 24 dB above our hearing threshold of about 120 dB.
120 dB is already unbearably loud and already represents something like the pain threshold for our hearing and is very damaging to our hearing even with brief exposure.
Values above 120 dB according to Google: 130 dB riveting hammer, 140 dB airplane take-off. 150 dB forging hammer. 160 dB gun bang.
So I think for AD/DA conversion and transport from/to the PC, 24 bit should actually be completely sufficient, shouldn't it?
When it comes to further processing in the DAW or volume control, things may look different again.
Breaking the whole thing down in an understandable way might also be an interesting topic for an RME YouTube video.
BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub14