Topic: UCX II low impedance headphone power

Hi there,

I would need a little assistance in my decision making.

I want to drive my DCA Aeon 2 Noire and wondering if the UCX II can handle the low impedance of 13 Ohm with enough current.

Always wanted to buy the ADI 2 Dac for my studio monitors and headphones. But just recently the demand increased to also have one or two mic inputs for an condenser mic. So I'm debating if the ucx is the better choice, knowing that their headphones amp is a little weaker.

Hope you can help. Thanks.

Re: UCX II low impedance headphone power

The lower the impedance is, the less power it needs.
The lower the impedance is, the easier it is to burn-out the headphone with too much power.
UCX ll is excellent choice.

M1-Sequoia, Madiface Pro, Digiface USB, Babyface silver and blue

Re: UCX II low impedance headphone power

Thank you waedi.

4 (edited by Maya 2024-11-02 13:34:54)

Re: UCX II low impedance headphone power

Thank you waedi.

Can you explain the technical reason behind your argument? Trying to understand it.
Why do low impedance hps require less power? I soley focused on the given efficiency if it can drive loud enough without running out of current.

5 (edited by ramses 2024-11-02 15:05:50)

Re: UCX II low impedance headphone power

Impedance (measured in ohms) is a measure of resistance to the electric current. Low-impedance headphones have less electrical resistance, allowing more current to flow through them for a given voltage. High-impedance headphones restrict current flow more, requiring a higher voltage to drive them at the same loudness level.

Maya wrote:

I want to drive my DCA Aeon 2 Noire and wondering if the UCX II can handle the low impedance of 13 Ohm with enough current.
Always wanted to buy the ADI 2 Dac for my studio monitors and headphones. But just recently the demand increased to also have one or two mic inputs for an condenser mic.
So I'm debating if the ucx is the better choice, knowing that their headphones amp is a little weaker.

When talking about an UCX, then you mean a device from used market as it is not being produced anymore.
Taking the UCX would be a fully budget driven choice.

In contrast to that UCX II (from 2021) offers much more in terms of features and improvements over the much older UCX which was designed and came to market 2012, which is already 12 years ago.

If you are unsure whether to take a recording interface like the UCX II or a reference converter like the ADI-2 DAC or Pro FS, then the answer is to get both to get the best of both worlds (in terms of features).

As you mentioned that you want to record with a microphone, etc, I recommend you to get a good recording interface with TotalMix FX first as a solid basement. The quality of those headphone outputs is also superb and can drive any "normal" headphone well enough.

At any time later you can integrate an ADI-2 DAC FS or ADI-2 Pro FS R BE or ADI-2/4 Pro SE easily into the setup.

Advantages I see here with the ADI-2 Pro FS R BE and ADI-2/4 Pro SE because they have the richer feature set.
Very useful is that they also offer analog inputs, more digital I/O IN and OUT.

Especially useful is the AES I/O (which btw the UCX doesn't support). Then you can integrate the reference converter by using AES, which also delivers galvanic isolation.
Then you still have the ADAT port of the UCX II free for other purposes, like e.g. connecting another 8-port Mic Preamp.
Or even another reference converter for the HiFi corner, if Studio and HiFi corner are not too far from each other.
ADAT supports officially around 10m, but 16m also work reliably for me up to 192 kHz, maybe even 20m would be possible.

More information ...

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub14

Re: UCX II low impedance headphone power

Thanks, that was really helpful.

Yes, I was talking about the UCX II. (Just skipped the II out of laziness).

In fact, I used to have the older UCX but sold it 5 Years ago. I was checking the used marked for the older UCX because I hoped to get it cheap and then later connect the ADI-2 Pro to it, so I can use Totalmix. But I realized that the prices are still strong even with the second gen out in market. People still want to have the same for it as when I sold it 5 years ago. A bit too much for the given age, in my opinion. So I will probably go with the second gen directly. I saw it has some features which I would enjoy over the older version.

And yes, you are right. Having the UCX II + ADI-2 Pro FS would be optimum. It's just too expensive at the moment to buy both for my needs.