vinark wrote:As MC said it depends on the receiving device, not the cable type. But if it is one device AD/DA converter (and not a separate da and ad converter), then that one should be the master anyway, since then the hdsp will only receive the digital data and jitter is then irrelevant.
As MC said if they are separate, the AD should be the master as that is the moment audio is recorded and should be as jitter free as possible. When mixing or mastering you could make your DA master to make sure you have best listening quality....
All this is based on the fact that the internal clock always works best and can not be improved by a better external clock.
Thank you so much for this explanation!
I must confess I'm not so savvy with digital interconnections so would appreciate detailed instructions that are simple and not too technical.
I also actually do not have a WCM (word clock module) yet but I'm considering buying one if it will benefit my setup.
I can connect Burl B2 Bomber ADC to the HDSP 9632 using just the SPDIF connection only. In this connection, the Burl B2 uses its internal clock and is the master clock, and, as far as I know, the clock timing is derived from the SPDIF data stream received by the HDSP 9632.
Now, if I buy a WCM and use it such that the clock signal sent from the Burl B2 word clock output to the WCM word clock input is used by the HDSP 9632 for the clock timing (instead of deriving the timing from the SPDIF data stream), would it give me better performance/digital audio transfer quality? If yes, approximately how much percent better will it be? I really just want to know if buying a WCM for $179 which is not cheap is really a worthwhile investment for me.
Thanks again!