It is obvious that mediummanting does not know what the bit test provides him. Otherwise, he would have been able to validate long ago that the bit test is passed with and without the additional device.
It would then be clear that in both cases it is a lossless transfer of digital audio data and that the final D/A conversion is performed in both cases with identical digital audio data which leads to the same analog wave form after the conversion.
Whoever is still talking about differences at this point has unfortunately not understood anything..
Furthermore, I believe that mediummanting does not use the correct test methodology to exclude psychoacoustic phenomena, which must mislead him here.
What I would at least expect from him is, to simply run the bit test with and without this device.
It should - if the test was performed correctly (i.e. correct choice of player, volume at 100%, best use of the ASIO driver) - always come to the same result, that the bit test was passed.
Well, and then there can be no sound differences. Again this is clear, obvious and no matter of a discussion.
BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub13