• ramses
  • DAW Mastermind
  • Offline
  • From: UTC+1
  • Registered: 2012-10-14
  • Posts: 11,474

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

Bernd, they offer it as a bundle, this does not mean that you can load VSTs to the recording interface or into TotalMix FX.
But of course you can use those VST/VSTi in your DAW or some of them maybe also stand-alone.
Anyway it's still great, this is an additional worth of several hundred Dollars that you get for free.
The Brainworks mastering VST alone costs around $299 and this is a real great mastering VST ...

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub13
  • spnc
  • AD/DA expert
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2022-07-04
  • Posts: 33

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

Well that's a bummer the RME UCX II is officially discontinued.

https://www.thomann.de/gb/rme_fireface_ucx_ii.htm

https://i.ibb.co/9wTmnzc/Screenshot-2022-07-16-at-01-52-31.png

53 Reply by MC

  • MC
  • MC
  • Administrator
  • Offline
  • From: Germany/Thailand
  • Registered: 2007-04-06
  • Posts: 24,393

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

Good grief -  'officially discontinued' can only be if WE say that is the case.

But the opposite is true. That Thomann info is just a bit misleading in wording. The UCX II will be back with them too.

Regards
Matthias Carstens
RME

MC's Website

54 Reply by spnc (edited by spnc 2022-07-16 17:10:11)

  • spnc
  • AD/DA expert
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2022-07-04
  • Posts: 33

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

MC wrote:

Good grief -  'officially discontinued' can only be if WE say that is the case.

But the opposite is true. That Thomann info is just a bit misleading in wording. The UCX II will be back with them too.

Communications still not on point as I see it... would be nice to be telling these simple things to your customers... how are we supposed to know whether it's a global chip shortage or an actual discontinuation??

  • Registered: 2022-10-06
  • Posts: 17

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

I'm curious - why doesn't UCX II have USB (3/thunderbolt) Type-C like UFX+ does? For a device released in 2021 that's kinda weird.

  • ramses
  • DAW Mastermind
  • Offline
  • From: UTC+1
  • Registered: 2012-10-14
  • Posts: 11,474

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

HardRock wrote:

I'm curious - why doesn't UCX II have USB (3/thunderbolt) Type-C like UFX+ does? For a device released in 2021 that's kinda weird.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSIf4QGYs-c

It should be known by now that RME only uses the I/O that is really necessary according to the bandwidth requirement in terms of number of channels.

Then customers have the advantage of being able to connect and use the recording interface on as many devices as possible (not every device has thunderbolt).

RME manages around 68 channels with USB2. So, why should they use Thunderbolt, which would only drive up the costs unnecessarily and raise unnecessary requirements to have thunderbolt in their computer.

Other manufacturers use thunderbolt because they didn't get it, managed to write capable drivers for USB or because they live in the Apple cloud of devices / connections.

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub13
  • Registered: 2022-10-06
  • Posts: 17

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

ramses wrote:
HardRock wrote:

I'm curious - why doesn't UCX II have USB (3/thunderbolt) Type-C like UFX+ does? For a device released in 2021 that's kinda weird.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSIf4QGYs-c

It should be known by now that RME only uses the I/O that is really necessary according to the bandwidth requirement in terms of number of channels.

Then customers have the advantage of being able to connect and use the recording interface on as many devices as possible (not every device has thunderbolt).

RME manages around 68 channels with USB2. So, why should they use Thunderbolt, which would only drive up the costs unnecessarily and raise unnecessary requirements to have thunderbolt in their computer.

Other manufacturers use thunderbolt because they didn't get it, managed to write capable drivers for USB or because they live in the Apple cloud of devices / connections.

I've watched the video. They said that at 24bit/192 KHz USB 2.0 tops out at 53 channels. So in theory that's good enough for UCX II's advertised 40 channels. But then UFX II which is up to 60 channels is still USB 2.0 as well. Then they said their driver makes it work, but there are devices using RME interfaces in class compliant mode, because drivers are available only for Windows and Mac.

So thanks for the link, but I remain unconvinced by their reasoning. Having at least USB 3.0 wouldn't add much if at all to the price that is already premium.

58 Reply by ramses (edited by ramses 2022-10-09 10:38:09)

  • ramses
  • DAW Mastermind
  • Offline
  • From: UTC+1
  • Registered: 2012-10-14
  • Posts: 11,474

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

Look back, USB2 and FW400 were fully sufficient for the old UFX with 30 input and output channels.

Even for the MADIface USB, USB2 was sufficient, and it had even 68 (!!) channels in and out.
https://archiv.rme-audio.de/products/madiface_pro.php

From this, you can easily conclude, that for the UFX II, which is a 30 channel interface, USB2 is fully sufficient.

You should be glad…

EDIT: and the new MADIface USB driver even supports buffer sizes down to 32 samples, with the older USB driver of UFX / UCX 48 samples was the minimum buffer size. An improvement for cases where you need it.

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub13

59 Reply by ramses (edited by ramses 2022-10-09 10:38:04)

  • ramses
  • DAW Mastermind
  • Offline
  • From: UTC+1
  • Registered: 2012-10-14
  • Posts: 11,474

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

Finally, compare the RTL (round trip latency) of different RME solutions.
You will note that you get the same good performance no matter whether you use thunderbolt, USB3, USB2, FW400 or PCIe.

See my blog article about UFX+. It contains an overview about RTL of different RME solutions:
https://www.tonstudio-forum.de/blog/Entry/68-RME-UFX/

https://www.tonstudio-forum.de/attachment/2343-ufx-ufx-raydat-latencies-v2-jpg/

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub13

60 Reply by ramses (edited by ramses 2022-10-09 10:38:16)

  • ramses
  • DAW Mastermind
  • Offline
  • From: UTC+1
  • Registered: 2012-10-14
  • Posts: 11,474

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

And this is an application performance test with a large Cubase project with plenty of tracks and VSTs in it.

No issues, no matter whether you use
— a RayDAT (PCIe based) or UFX+ (USB3 based) or
— single or double speed (96 kHz).

https://www.tonstudio-forum.de/blog/Ent … cks-de-en/

This with a 8y old PC with server mainboard and Xeon CPU:
https://www.tonstudio-forum.de/blog/Ent … mponenten/

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub13

61 Reply by ramses (edited by ramses 2022-10-09 10:37:49)

  • ramses
  • DAW Mastermind
  • Offline
  • From: UTC+1
  • Registered: 2012-10-14
  • Posts: 11,474

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

Another aspect comes to my mind.
USB2 supports up to 5 m long cables, which is a real advantage in terms of placing the components around your desk.
With USB3 you (still) have 3 m … but which is just about enough for my setup.
With Thunderbolt, the cables are much more expensive and the maximum cable length is 2 m.
This would be too short in my setup with the devices left and the PC right from my desk.

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub13

62 Reply by MC

  • MC
  • MC
  • Administrator
  • Offline
  • From: Germany/Thailand
  • Registered: 2007-04-06
  • Posts: 24,393

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

HardRock wrote:

I've watched the video. They said that at 24bit/192 KHz USB 2.0 tops out at 53 channels. So in theory that's good enough for UCX II's advertised 40 channels.

Watch it again - 192 kHz! And 52 STEREO channels!

At 192 kHz the UCX II has 14+14=28 channels only, not 40.

HardRock wrote:

But then UFX II which is up to 60 channels is still USB 2.0 as well.

18+18=36 channels at 192 kHz.

Regards
Matthias Carstens
RME

MC's Website

  • Registered: 2022-10-06
  • Posts: 17

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

MC wrote:
HardRock wrote:

I've watched the video. They said that at 24bit/192 KHz USB 2.0 tops out at 53 channels. So in theory that's good enough for UCX II's advertised 40 channels.

Watch it again - 192 kHz! And 52 STEREO channels!

At 192 kHz the UCX II has 14+14=28 channels only, not 40.

HardRock wrote:

But then UFX II which is up to 60 channels is still USB 2.0 as well.

18+18=36 channels at 192 kHz.

There's another curious question. USB 2.0 is one way only, which means at best it's half-duplex. Now for asynchronous devices like printers and such that may not matter. But for an audio interface where real time matters?

For instance if I plug my guitar in direct, use software modeler to play though studio monitors - both my input and output signals will only be sent half of the time, because of USB 2.0's one way restriction, right? Surely that is a bad thing, whereas USB 3.0 is capable of full duplex and doesn't have this problem?

  • Registered: 2021-02-28
  • Posts: 42

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

This is a nice little unit that you could take on the road, and still have full functionality (including 6 physical outputs for surround sound).

www.summeroflovemusic.com
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2039241

65 Reply by ramses (edited by ramses 2022-11-01 21:07:02)

  • ramses
  • DAW Mastermind
  • Offline
  • From: UTC+1
  • Registered: 2012-10-14
  • Posts: 11,474

Re: The new RME UCX II - wow !

HardRock wrote:

There's another curious question. USB 2.0 is one way only, which means at best it's half-duplex. Now for asynchronous devices like printers and such that may not matter. But for an audio interface where real time matters?

For instance if I plug my guitar in direct, use software modeler to play though studio monitors - both my input and output signals will only be sent half of the time, because of USB 2.0's one way restriction, right? Surely that is a bad thing, whereas USB 3.0 is capable of full duplex and doesn't have this problem?

There is no problem, data arrives still fast enough.
With USB 2.0 RME supports up to 68ch IN and OUT (MADIface USB).

Additionally, you have several benefits:
- cable length up to 5 m allow flexible placement of components
- even older computer have USB2 ports
- cables are cheaper
- as far as I remember with USB2 there were no chipset issues like with USB3, see UFX+ manual ch 40.3, compatibility infos

Here the RTL of different RME solutions I own(ed), as you can see, TB/USB/FW is on par with only little differences:
https://www.tonstudio-forum.de/attachme … ies-v2-jpg

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub13