along with the PCI-Express card.....please oh please....I'm going insane!

Don't like using my Digi 002R or my Motu 8pre.....

+1

+1

+2 (both hands)

+4 (both hands & both feet)

---> psvennevig   .... so why no digicheck on mac ????
+1 +1 +1 +1 +1 !!!

Definitely, and MacIntel native.
H

+100 pretty please

would be great

Stay positive guys, I have a feeling that we may see something soon. MIDI remote for Mac will be handy too. LOTS of people want it.

15 and counting! Hey, if we all put in $2000....we'd be somewhere else.

C'mon, there must be more than 15 MacIntel users out there. Don't make me start counting feet.

RME? Bitte Bitte Bitte?

DigiCheck on Mac Intel, this would be awesome!

The evidence is here for quite some time. We have plans to release DIGICheck as Mac Intel version, but there is no date when this will happen. Of course I hope still this year, but...

As a kind of training/test case we are working on the mac version of the MIDI Remote tool. And that looks quite good so far.

Me too - my working time with Fireface800 is split between Logic Pro, Final Cut Pro and Soundtrack Pro, and I'm on a variety of Apple Intel machines.

BTW - Soundtrack Pro 2 (from FCS 2) seems to be allergic to the Fireface 800 driver and won't select  the appropriate input without an error message. That having been said, Soundtrack Pro 2 is the worst Apple release I've experienced since OS8 - runs like a late alpha version. Whoever made the decision to release it needs a good slappin'.

Mathias, would it be possible to have Total mix, settings dialogue, digicheck and FUT all in one interface? Perhaps tabbed or at least some common window that has other windows accessible from within itself.

Is anyone interested in DIGICheck for Mac?

I was very disappointed when I found out that it is available for Windows only.

What pisses me off extremely, is that you cannot know that until you have a look at the downloads section.
I bought my Fireface 800 thinking that it supports DIGICheck and of course thinking that DIGICheck works on an Apple computer, too.
I think it is quite strange not to mention this fact at all. Not at all on product pages like the one of the Fireface 800, even not in the description of DIGICheck !?

What if I'm a potential buyer? - Must I really visit the support pages BEFORE I buy a RME product? (..to find out what the product features are?)

i think you're way offline!
Actually, it's shame on yourself, for not getting informed before buying.
And for sure RME is not responsable for that, only yourself and the dealer (shop) where you bought the Fireface 800.

Peace,
Victor

I think RME (like any other firm) has an obligation to inform potential buyers up front, so not in the download section, but on the product page (NOT AVAILABLE FOR MAC) In big bold red type.

Come on, this guy is not way out of line!

Robert.

Please remember that Digicheck is Freeware. You are not paying for it with the price of the FF800 or any other RME product, and it is not an integral part of the hardware or the driver. Plenty of RME owners may simply never use it. I don't see how it is "barely legal" to make freeware presents to Windows users only. So far, separate development and maintenance of a Mac version would have simply been too expensive. With the arrival of the Intel Mac, things have changed, and if you had taken a moment for a pre-rant search of this forum, you would have found a statement saying we are indeed planning to do an Intel Mac version, but since this is not part of our main driver development work, we are unable to specify a date for such a release at the moment.

Here's an affordable alternative for OSX: Spectre

Regards,
Daniel Fuchs
RME

Maybe it does not matter if Digicheck is free-ware etc. because it is used as a selling point.
You buy into the package  and the package should work as advertised unless otherwise mentioned.

I think this is governed by law, but I'm  no l_awyer :-).

Just put the "not for mac" on the web page?

PS $150 for spectra is paying quite a bit extra.

Regards,

Robert.

what is the matter with you guys?
You are talking about "illegal", laws and lawyers ...
RME is not selling anything. You can't buy anything from RME, but only from XYZ (your local distributor). So if XYZ is advertising a RME product with false features, that you can eventually call illegal.
You think that using hard words will force RME into doing it, or do it faster?
I doubt it!
And to conclude :-): a sentence like "Not available for Mac" would be just fine.

Peace,
Victor

I have two intensions concerning this thread.

1.) I want to find users that have interest in DIGICheck for Mac OS X generally, not intel-mac only. Maybe it would be a reason for RME to release a Mac version of DIGICheck if there were hundreds of users requesting it.

2.) I want to get some opinions concerning the informations about DIGICheck on the RME webpage, just to call attention to the fact that RME seems to leave out a sentence like "(AVAILABLE FOR WINDOWS ONLY)" deliberately (!).

Okay. - If you read all the disclaimers on the RME page you can see that they exlude liability for the webpages content.
If they want they can write the biggest shit on their pages and it's still legally allowed. .. So forget about illegal or barely legal... sorry, my fault..

But in my opinion the way DIGICheck is mentioned on the RME product pages is at least a matter of VERY, VERY BAD TASTE, isn't it?
So, the main question is:
WHY ? - WHY CAN'T RME MAKE CLEAR THAT DIGICHECK IS AVAILABLE FOR WINDOWS ONLY ?

What? Are you serious? - Come on! .. Did I ever mention the box? -No! Please read carefully! All my thoughts concern the RME webpages. - What if I buy it online?

.. - that's what is the question.. -

..and also what I thought in the beginning, too. But I'm not sure anymore, because I couldn't see any changes during the last four months since I've contacted RME. And as we can see RME still fails to see the mistake.