Topic: Amp Sims instrument input gain UFX-II Neural DSP

Hi brains trust

Wondering if anyone can advise or clarify the manual. I have a query regarding setting the gain to use with Amp Sims (ie Neural DSP). They advise 12.2dBu (on Apollow interfaces this is achieved by setting the Input Gain on the Instrument to ZERO, calibrated to +13). The below video describes setting the RME input gain to +13, however the Instrument inputs on my UFX-II do not have this option. If I select "Instrument", it sets the gain to 8dB and there is no +13 option.

So...

From the Manual:Maximum Input: Level: Gain 8 = +21dBu, Gain 50 = -21dBu.
Going by that, and doing the math, should I set the gain to 16dB to get the max to +13dBu? Hope that makes sense. (then add the 0.8dB in Neural DSP plugin to achieve 12.2dBu)

I hope my question makes sense....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTIqslg … %26Pickups

Thanks
Regards, Nathan.

2

Re: Amp Sims instrument input gain UFX-II Neural DSP

Setting the INST option gives you a max input level of +21 dBu, @ 8 dB gain! So to get +13 dBu as max input level you need +16 dB gain.

Regards
Matthias Carstens
RME

Re: Amp Sims instrument input gain UFX-II Neural DSP

MC wrote:

Setting the INST option gives you a max input level of +21 dBu, @ 8 dB gain! So to get +13 dBu as max input level you need +16 dB gain.

Ok thanks, so what you're saying is my statement above is correct. Good to know!

Re: Amp Sims instrument input gain UFX-II Neural DSP

MC wrote:

Setting the INST option gives you a max input level of +21 dBu, @ 8 dB gain! So to get +13 dBu as max input level you need +16 dB gain.


Been playing with this using the Neural DSP plugins.  It seems if I set my Instrument input gain to 17dB, this translates to my DI guitar signal hitting Logic at around -25dBfs - a very low signal. I'm thinking it should be around -13 to -15 or so. Somewhere here the maths is wrong. -25 its even hard to see the waveform even zoomed. Seems far too low.  This doesn't add up.

Re: Amp Sims instrument input gain UFX-II Neural DSP

nwarrick wrote:

I'm thinking it should be around -13 to -15 or so. Somewhere here the maths is wrong. -25 its even hard to see the waveform even zoomed. Seems far too low.  This doesn't add up.

SMPTE recommends -20 dBFS as the alignment level for 24 bit recording, EBU recommends -18 dBFS.

This article explains these considerations very well: https://www.soundonsound.com/sound-advi … -recording

Fireface UCX II + ARC USB > ADI-2 Pro FS R BE > Neumann KH 750 DSP + MA 1 > KH 120 A

Re: Amp Sims instrument input gain UFX-II Neural DSP

unpluggged wrote:
nwarrick wrote:

I'm thinking it should be around -13 to -15 or so. Somewhere here the maths is wrong. -25 its even hard to see the waveform even zoomed. Seems far too low.  This doesn't add up.

SMPTE recommends -20 dBFS as the alignment level for 24 bit recording, EBU recommends -18 dBFS.

This article explains these considerations very well: https://www.soundonsound.com/sound-advi … -recording


So going by the picture on that, a plugin amp-sim wanting to see 12dBu is equivalent to -12dBFS.  But not what the above maths tells me doing the conversion based on my interface specs.

From the Manual:Maximum Input: Level: Gain 8 = +21dBu, Gain 50 = -21dBu.
Going by that, and doing the math, I set the gain to 16dB to get the max to +13dBu.

Hope that makes sense.

But with my Instrument Input on the RME at, say 17dB gain, I'm peaking around -25dBFS (closer to 0dBu).

Still confused.

7 (edited by ramses 2024-10-18 14:05:02)

Re: Amp Sims instrument input gain UFX-II Neural DSP

I never made such math and simply oriented on getting a good input signal for
- recording and
- routing my guitar input signal further
because I have different use cases anyway...

I route my dry guitar signal (directly from the guitar) to my amps (overdrive pedal in front of it) and
record it for any potential reamping purposes or use it for VSTi.

Should I always use a different gain value for the guitar? I think no.

I think I should simply do what you always do in front of an A/D conversion.
Look that you get a good input signal, but keep enough headroom.

Here, RME's Autoset feature was of excellent help for me.

Enable Autoset on the Instr input, raise the gain to a value, that Autoset has something to do ... then strum harder and harder into the strings. Besides strumming into the strings use every guitar / playing technique from which you know that it produces high peaks like pumping rhythms / power chords on the lower E-A--D strings. Guitar volume and Tone pot at max (not dampening higher frequencies). Use each of the PUs single and also in combination, you never know whats louder.

At the end (after using Autoset for all guitars) it boils down for me that I use with UFX III
- 20 dB Instr Gain for all Humbucker guitars (all with Gibson '57 Classic PU)
- 22 dB Instr Gain for one Single Coil Guitar with Texas specials, which are a little bit hotter

Of course, since you don't always hit the guitar strings like a savage with extreme power, using the gain values determined by Autoset will ultimately result in input levels that are not too hot, which is what the SOS article quoted by unplugged also emphasises, i.e. not to overdrive when recording and mixing.

By this / using RME "Autoset" I am getting wonderful recording levels for all guitars.

This screenshot as an example playing power chords in a more normal way with absolute peaks of -8.8 and good RMS.
Part of signal flow in short: via Guitar--->InstInp9---UFX III--->Amp Input

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/kc7he5s8nwh5dyfkxawqm/2024-10-17-TotalMix-FX-1.97-Auxdevice-PCM81-as-ext-FX.jpg?rlkey=i4x1vq7qbvo13e3jiobfyj2pv&st=rs9kp00k&dl=1

EDIT:

If you should find out that the levels for playing over VSTi do not match, because there is too much or missing gain,
then I would try to find a way to correct that in the VSTi.
There should be something like a global knob to adjust the input volume.

Otherwise you would have instantly to switch Gain Levels on the Recording Interface which makes no sense to me.
Better one level there and adjust the VSTi, because then also reamping with different VSTi or VSTi presets will be
possible without not too much hassles.

SGear3, which I use, has something like this in the I/O panel, not sure whether this is per preset or a global setting
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/pzu7ho5h5zhz8253khvua/2024-10-18-SGear3-IO.jpg?rlkey=0k8n7xsru6g6gqyff50r3ix6t&st=8bcj6n9p&dl=1

Maybe there are different ways and finallly it is important that it sounds ok. From operational perspective I like my approach to consequently use Autoset to find the proper level for all of my guitars very easily this way and to have a unique input level no matter which guitar I use.

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub14

Re: Amp Sims instrument input gain UFX-II Neural DSP

ramses wrote:

I never made such math and simply oriented on getting a good input signal for
- recording and
- routing my guitar input signal further
because I have different use cases anyway...

I route my dry guitar signal (directly from the guitar) to my amps (overdrive pedal in front of it) and
record it for any potential reamping purposes or use it for VSTi.

Should I always use a different gain value for the guitar? I think no.

I think I should simply do what you always do in front of an A/D conversion.
Look that you get a good input signal, but keep enough headroom.

Here, RME's Autoset feature was of excellent help for me.

Enable Autoset on the Instr input, raise the gain to a value, that Autoset has something to do ... then strum harder and harder into the strings. Besides strumming into the strings use every guitar / playing technique from which you know that it produces high peaks like pumping rhythms / power chords on the lower E-A--D strings. Guitar volume and Tone pot at max (not dampening higher frequencies). Use each of the PUs single and also in combination, you never know whats louder.

At the end (after using Autoset for all guitars) it boils down for me that I use with UFX III
- 20 dB Instr Gain for all Humbucker guitars (all with Gibson '57 Classic PU)
- 22 dB Instr Gain for one Single Coil Guitar with Texas specials, which are a little bit hotter

Of course, since you don't always hit the guitar strings like a savage with extreme power, using the gain values determined by Autoset will ultimately result in input levels that are not too hot, which is what the SOS article quoted by unplugged also emphasises, i.e. not to overdrive when recording and mixing.

By this / using RME "Autoset" I am getting wonderful recording levels for all guitars.

This screenshot as an example playing power chords in a more normal way with absolute peaks of -8.8 and good RMS.
Part of signal flow in short: via Guitar--->InstInp9---UFX III--->Amp Input

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/kc7he5s8nwh5dyfkxawqm/2024-10-17-TotalMix-FX-1.97-Auxdevice-PCM81-as-ext-FX.jpg?rlkey=i4x1vq7qbvo13e3jiobfyj2pv&st=rs9kp00k&dl=1

EDIT:

If you should find out that the levels for playing over VSTi do not match, because there is too much or missing gain,
then I would try to find a way to correct that in the VSTi.
There should be something like a global knob to adjust the input volume.

Otherwise you would have instantly to switch Gain Levels on the Recording Interface which makes no sense to me.
Better one level there and adjust the VSTi, because then also reamping with different VSTi or VSTi presets will be
possible without not too much hassles.

SGear3, which I use, has something like this in the I/O panel, not sure whether this is per preset or a global setting
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/pzu7ho5h5zhz8253khvua/2024-10-18-SGear3-IO.jpg?rlkey=0k8n7xsru6g6gqyff50r3ix6t&st=8bcj6n9p&dl=1

Maybe there are different ways and finallly it is important that it sounds ok. From operational perspective I like my approach to consequently use Autoset to find the proper level for all of my guitars very easily this way and to have a unique input level no matter which guitar I use.



Seems a lot like a "common sense, use your ears and a bit of logic" approach rather than crunching numbers to get a calibrated ideal!

9 (edited by ramses 2024-10-19 08:49:20)

Re: Amp Sims instrument input gain UFX-II Neural DSP

The logic and conclusions in my posting above came later, after reading your question but also the SOS article.

The fine tuning came almost automatically. To do silent recording with 2 tube amps and get a reasonably appealing lead sound, you have to use your ears. Some things sounded too harsh when the levels were turned up too high between UFX III and guitar, amps, external FX.

I've always found Autoset sexy because it takes the work out of levelling any guitar quickly and in the same way. Playing via VSTi came later because I happened to find a really convincing sounding one.

The setting with Autoset is even so good that I can record an archtop on its own without VSTi and it even sounds good "as is".

I say the setup came about automatically and also followed the idea that one of my guitarist friends kept saying: it's best not to push the levels of devices too far.

Have I ever worried about the level of a guitar amp? No, there was headroom in the analogue world, but you never saw it. You orientated yourself using the VU meters and the saying ‘level out to 0 dB’, and if necessary drive a little into the band saturation.

Now I also have headroom in the digital world. And just like in the analogue world, I try not to use it too cramped. SNR and dynamics are at a much higher level these days, so you can afford to work at lower levels.

It sounds a bit strange to my ears having to cope with Instrument Gain/Levels when working with VSTi. Like with any other plugin I expect that it works with reasonable levels and allows fine tuning of input and output levels, similar to a effect processor for guitar.

And then it appears to me more comfortably having VSTi or devices which are adjusted to the level of my setup and that I have a generic approach for a defined guitar level using Autoset.


Finally, when it sounds right in all situations, then I am satisfied more is not needed.

The approach of tuning the level of the guitar to each effect device may also work for some people,
I don't want to rule that out with my words. But it seems far too complicated to me.
I prefer a simpler method that works in all situations as well.

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub14