Topic: HDSPe AoX-D card + SFP MADI versus HDSPe MADI FX + Digiface Dante?
I'm trying to evaluate which is a better way to get MADI and Dante both into and out of the computer (Mac), using only one PCIe interface. Lowest latency possible is my primary concern, but not my only concern.
1. HDSPe AoX-D Dante card with the AoX-MADI-EXT-SFP MADI daughter card
2. HDSPe MADI FX card with MADI coax daughter card and with the Digiface Dante used as a format converter to take Dante and convert it to MADI coax, and then send that to the MADI coax on the HDSPe MADI FX daughter card.
In both scenarios, I intend to place the PCIe card into a TB enclosure, and then connect that to my M1 Mac Studio. The MADI connection is for my Burl converters and the Dante connection would be for the Lynx Aurora (n). Price is a consideration, but I'm primarily focused on which of the two scenarios offers the best round trip latency performance, if I want to software monitor thru the DAW (Cubase) while tracking. However, I'd be interested in hearing any other benefits that one scenario might provide over the other.
What are your thoughts on which is the best way to go?