1 (edited by neirbod 2010-05-18 19:17:33)

Topic: Fireface 800 update planned?

Hello,

I am a mostly happy FF800 user, and have ben for many years.  I love many aspects of the unit, especially the flexible ins and outs, stable drivers, and total mix.  But, as my business (location recording, mostly choirs) grows, I find myself looking at other 1U units with better conversion and preamps, notably the Prism Orpheus and Metric Halo ULN-8.  I have concluded that what I *really* want is a FF800 version 2.0 that has world class conversion and preamps to compete directly with these other two boxes.  I know this box would not come cheap, but for those of us considering plunking down $4,500 for an Orpheus, let me say I'd gladly pay that for an updated FF800 if the preamps and conversion were similar.

Please don't take this a RME bashing.  The FF800 is great, but it isn't up to par with other boxes now on the market for the most ciritical recordings.  Yes, I know I can use external pres and converters, but a 1U solution is so nice for location work.

So, anyone know if RME is looking into such an update?  Give me a ULN-8 pre and conversion with the RME ins/outs, total mix, and drivers, and I am sold!

(RME, if you are working on such a thing and need a beta tester, you know where to reach me!)

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

You won't get an answer, it's not a smart business move to release this information premature, it impacts the current sales of the FF800.

If you need to move up in class, I suggest you just do it.

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

Understood.  I didn't really expect a response from RME, but I thought someone here may have heard something.

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

I have concluded that what I *really* want is a FF800 version 2.0 that has world class conversion and preamps to compete directly with these other two boxes.

I see no market for a Fireface for ?4.099,00 like the Orpheus or ?4.789,00 like the MH. If you want to spend so much money go for a real high-end preamp and AD converter, like the Micstasy - which is used in many world-class classic recordings. Or choose the ADI-8 QS converter, providing the best possible AD/DA conversion today.

best regards
Knut

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

Admin Knut wrote:

I see no market for a Fireface for ?4.099,00 like the Orpheus or ?4.789,00 like the MH.

I completely disagree.  Both the Orpheus and MH are getting rave reviews and are selling very well due to their great converters and preamps.  However, MH is Mac only and the the Orphues' software is sub-par.  RME is still known for having the best drivers and software, and of course work with a PC.  I fail to see how a box with RME's assets plus world class converters and preamps would not be a huge seller. 

Just looking around the classified ads in Gearslutz shows many people selling their FF800/400 to upgrade to one of these other offerings.  Yes, buying external conveters and pres is an option, but many are looking for an all-in-one solution in a 1U box, which is ideal for project studios and location recordings.  If RME doesn't want to go that route, that is of course their decision.  But to not see a potentially large market is just ignoring the facts.

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

Both the Orpheus and MH are getting rave reviews and are selling very well due to their great converters and preamps.

I respect your opinion but the same is true for the Firefaces - with better features and specs - for a fraction of the costs.

best regards
Knut

7 (edited by JC28 2010-05-25 03:44:40)

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

Admin Knut wrote:

Both the Orpheus and MH are getting rave reviews and are selling very well due to their great converters and preamps.

I respect your opinion but the same is true for the Firefaces - with better features and specs - for a fraction of the costs.

best regards
Knut

However, you're still missing the point that the OP and Neirbod are making.  The Fireface units are in need of a converter upgrade, period.  Not saying they sound bad, but the new interfaces, including Steinberg's MR816 and the new Focusrite Saffire series, offer better (or at least comparable converter quality) for less money.  I think its time for a Fireface 2.0 or similar product.  You could even offer a Fireface Plus for those who want converters comparable to your Micstasy or ADI-8 QS units.

Just a thought, no harm meant.

Core i7 4770K | 32GB of RAM | Windows 7 Pro (SP1) 64 bit | Cubase 8.5 64 bit | RME FireFace UCX |

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

That was indeed my point.  Thanks for reviving this discusion, JC28.  A "Fireface plus" would be a good option for those who want to pay extra for the best preamps and converters. 

I appreciate your points, Knut, but I must respectfully disagree with your suggestion that the FF converters and preamps are in the same league as the Prism and Metric Halo units.  I have not had a chance to compare these units personally (although I have an Orpheus on the way), but many, many respected egineers have argued that the FF pres and converters are good but not great compared to some high-end competition.   With some truly great and affordable competition on the market, RME may want to raise the bar for the FF.  I can say first hand the FF pres are just not very useful for most critical recordings. 

If RME combined the routing flexibility and stability of the FF with top of the line converters and some nice, clean pres they would have a best seller.

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

No problem.  I totally agree with you.

I would sell my FF400 and buy a "Fireface 2" in a heart beat (The "Fireface Plus" would probably be out of my league though).

Core i7 4770K | 32GB of RAM | Windows 7 Pro (SP1) 64 bit | Cubase 8.5 64 bit | RME FireFace UCX |

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

I (my company) owns 2 FF800 devices. They are used as loudspeaker processor (EQ, X-OVER, Limiting dynamics) which uses processing power of computer's CPU. EQ is a special combination of linear/minimum phase FIR filters. Software is custom made, developed through experience for 15 years now. (planned to be commercial). Together with 2 FF800 it gives very flexible and powerful (lot of I/O's) environment which I miss using clasical DBX or XTA processors.

There is almost no audio event (we make app. 100 events per year) without RME gear involved. Last friday we provided sound and light for open air HedKand DJ show. Performers and audience were very pleased with the sound quality. (People livnig less than 4 kilometers around-not so pleased).

I must say AD and DA conversion of FF800 are excellent. For live performance SN ratio is not so important as for studio, so studio freaks may argue. But overall sound colour and sweetnes of highs is perfect. FF800 outputs are connected directly to power amps driving each speaker section independently (4 way system). MH horns operate from 1-6.5kHz and HF horns above 6.5kHz. Audio quality mostly depends on reproduction of mid and high frequencies. I have heard some devices with better tech datas, (cheaper according to less IO's) but sound was nothing compared to FF800. Using such on HF speaker line gives harsh and unnatural sound.

Needles to say, any driver/hardware issue is nightmare for us. And there were issues in the past. BTW I still don't know whether 3.xxx release candidate driver is OK or not. It is a release candidate for a long time...

I think it's time to retire FF800 device and replace it with completely new one. Not due to converters but due to computer interconnection and all (mainly hardware related) problems with it. It should have more than just one type of port; FireWire, USB(II and III), and special designed PCI(e) IO card like high-end RME products, so users can decide between portability and robustness of connection (desktop computer <-> PCI, notebooks <-> FW and USB). Feaures as on-board effect processing is not so important from my point of view. For new FF800 device I just want bulletproof audio IO (driver), equal or more channels per unit and speaking of AD/DA, +24dBU would be nice. Front line Mic/Line gains through MIDI and manual switches for Phantom and level on all channels would also be nice. Price <= 2000?/unit

11 (edited by neirbod 2010-06-01 20:32:12)

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

Agreed that any Fireface update should go to USB III as that is clearly the connection of the future for audio.  Extra flexibility for ins and outs would be great as well, but I think the  FF is pretty good that way already.

By the way, I got my Orpheus to demo a couple days ago.  I haven't had time to put it through its full paces, but my first impressions are exactly what I heard from others - the converters are stellar and the software is pretty poor but functional.  Comparing the Orpheus and my FF at 96K and 24 bit (using the same external pres), the FF sounds a bit cloudy in a subtle but significant way.  The Orpheus is crystal clear.  I noticed it most on a drum recording.  The Orpheus really sounds "3D" - I can hear not just the panning of toms, but the relative distance from the listener so I can hear the depth of the kit.  I don't hear that with the FF.  Also, the lows lows sound much tighter on the Orpheus, making the kick sound *so* nice.  The kick through the FF sounds flabby and undefined by comparison.

I need to do a fully blind AB test with additional sources, and I also plan to compare the pres to my Sytek pres.  So far I can say the differences are quite apparent, although not "night and day" as some have indicated.  For my line of work (mostly classical), I think the additional clarity of the Orpheus may be well worth the investment.

The software is very clunky and limited compared to Total Mix.  This may be partly due to the learning curve, but there also seems to be poorer integration with Sonar so that I need to be careful the order in which I make changes to e.g., the clock.

I'll post more later, as I know other folks here are likely looking at the Orpheus.  Again, I don't want to come across as RME bashing as I have been a loyal FF user for many years.  I sincerely hope RME updates the FF, but I am not holding my breath.

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

I have not had a chance to compare these units personally (although I have an Orpheus on the way), but many, many respected egineers have argued that the FF pres and converters are good but not great compared to some high-end competition.

I think this is not the best view to see all important points. On the one hand please believe me, that we get every day comments from all over the world telling us otherwise. There are countless artists - from home studio to high-profile engineers and producers - just telling us RME and especially the Fireface(s) are simply the best in it?s class and not only good, but really "great". Most of them own or use "high-end competition" but are not convinced - at least they don?t tell us. On the other hand please keep in mind that the RME philosophy is to capture the signal as it is. Not add something more or sound "warm" or "crisp" (= distortion), but record the signal in the most neutral way. Serious tests with measurement protocols and listening experience verify that especially the Firefaces do exactly that.

Of course there are high-end interfaces with better specs and maybe a "better" sound - like the RME ADI-8 QS - but the difference to this league is minimal at best. But the the price difference to the Fireface 400/800 is not. And in my opinion it would be no serious policy to give the impression to our respected customers the Fireface 800 is a second class unit - it?s definitely not - just to grab more money for such little improvements. Serious and honest testers would recognize this trick in a heartbeat and would have all reasons to be upset.

Please have also a look on our artist site. Some of them not only using one, but up to 5 Firefaces. Btw. I?am just cutting a new video from our visit of the great KISS concert in Hamburg yesterday: Lots of RME MADI interfaces and two Fireface UCs. The engineer was full of praise of our Micstasy preamp, which he knows from other recordings. It?s a high-end preamp with remote control used on countless classical recordings - the most critical ones. Some of them even won a Grammy in this category. The point is: the preamp technology is also used in the FF400/UC and the upcoming Babyface.

Just found this statement on Gearslutz. It describes the really important points better than I can:
"People have no clue what the Fireface actually is. It is a BRILLIANT product. To this day, un-parred.
The AD/DA is the exact same as the hi-end ADI8, found in numerous million dollar mastering studios. The PRES's is whats make these fusses alive. They are ''cold'', ergo NEUTRAL, which people out of classical ORTF, clean jazz, piano etc dont usually like. And in these situation, the RME kicks butt on location recording. The pre's are an extra BONUS, not the selling point!
The ad/da is quite neutral, not ''apogee warm'', not bla bla bla - And you can get all this too using your own dedicated inbox of choice, just convert externally! You can do it all with this unit.
It is a studio centerpiece and the clock is very very damn good! Of of the best around and jitter is minimal. Best drivers on the planet. "

Kasaudio: In my personal opinion I think it?s not time to retire the Fireface 800 yet - not only because it?s all in all still the best in its?class and proves it every day, but it?s also a future proof investement and gives customers a real price stability over years - very seldom these days. Imagine we would update the Fireface every two years like others - with no real improvements (new = better) - just for marketing reasons and to exploit the esoteric sound myths. Users with older Firefaces would be not happy about it, because their units would be degraded to second class gear for no reason, just to grab money and burn faith and respect instead. Maybe it?s old school german engineer thinking, but this is how RME did it since the beginning. This is not a serious policy for a long term and deep relationship we try to achieve between RME users and our products. I think the upcoming Babyface will set a new benchmark in this regard. It?s simply awesome to use it!

But I agree when the time is right RME will release a new product and you can be sure it will have the same impact and future proof technology like the Fireface (800), which leads it?s class since the day of the release. But you know we will not comment new developments in the public. This is no disrespect, but a serious and responsible policy.

best regards
Knut

13 (edited by neirbod 2010-06-01 21:28:49)

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

Admin Knut wrote:
neirbod wrote:

I have not had a chance to compare these units personally (although I have an Orpheus on the way), but many, many respected egineers have argued that the FF pres and converters are good but not great compared to some high-end competition.

Knut - Why quote something I wrote last week citing what I read online when I just wrote how I had personally compared the two devices and heard a significant difference in conversion?  I intend to do more thorough testing, but so far I can say there is a noticeable imporvement in the clarity, not coloration, from the Orpheus converters.  As for the FF800 pres, even FF800 advocates generally acknowledge they are the weak link.  That has certainly been my experience.  I hear the FF400 pres are better, but have no first hand knowledge.

I understand you defending the FF800, as you should.  I agree it is a great box that has served me well.  But, your own statements indicate that the converters and pres are not the best even among RME's own offerings.  You indicate that: 1) the RME ADI-QS may have "better sound"; 2) how good the Micstacy preamp is and how it is in the FF400 and Babyface

How about doing an updated FF800 that includes the conversion of hte ADI-QS and the preamps of the Micstacy?  Add USB III and the Babyface's new Total Mix and you'd have a winner.  As a FF800 user, I would welcome this update, not view it as a "trick" to "grab more money for such little improvements."  I'd gladly pay to upgrade if the sonics compared well to your competion.  Heck, I'll even offer right now to beta test such a device!

I don't want to belabor the point.  If RME doesn't plan to update the FF800, that is of course their decision.  I just don't want such a decision to be based on a misconception that there would be no market for such an update, because I stongly believe there is.

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

Point 1: Sorry, as you can see I post six minutes later and did not read your current statement, while I ?ve written my long post.

Point 2: I can only repeat myself. You are comparing an interface to the FF800 which costs 4100,- and provides much less features, but offers a better conversion in your experience. But in the end its a completely different product for a complete different market. Maybe you can compare it to an RME converter in this price class, like the ADI-8 QS - even usable on the Fireface ADAT I/O.

Point 3: Advantages of USB 3 for audio are simply not existent at the moment (see the statement of Uwe in the USB forum) and will not provide any real improvement. I can?t disagree to the point that there is a market for an interface, even with your specs (not the price), but you know ... no comment.

best regards
Knut

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

Admin Knut wrote:

The point is: the preamp technology is also used in the FF400/UC and the upcoming Babyface.

The RME implementation of the PGA2500 technology in these products is undisputably excellent.  However, I tend to regard both performance and facilities as equally important in what I do.  I will choose a device that may have less than perfect performance if its facilities allow me to do what I want to more efficiently.  The ability to digitally set and accurately reset preamp gain is one of those valued facilities that I have come to appreciate in my FF400.

While a Babyface with a Micstacy (computer control/reset via MIDI) may be a future option, a box with more than 2 mic preamps could be more convenient.   It is clear that the preamp technology of the FF400, FFUC and Babyface is widely accepted as the way of the future, because of performance, convenience, and even the fact that expensive panel space is not required for the gain trim knob!   

Everyone will assume that any new device will undoubtedly implement RME's more powerful FPGA processing and enhanced TotalMix capability.   I'm sure that RME can appreciate interest from those of us who would find an affordable box with 4, 6 or even 8 digitally controlled preamps and new TotalMix FX capability (apart from anything else RME has up its sleeve) a great way to improve the quality of the relationship we already have with our existing RME gear.   

Pity that audio perfectionism and impatience seem to go hand in hand ...

De gustibus - et sonus - non est disputandum

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

Panatrope, thanks for your comments and suggestions. As you can see all lately released products (FF400/UC) and the upcoming Babyface include this preamp technology so don?t worry about it. The new TotalMix provides also all controls direct in the mixer for all features: 48V, gain (+60 dB), Instrument and Pad buttons, Phase L+R, stereo width and much more. I?am sure most users will be blown away from all the new stuff in TotalMix FX, which now not only competes directly with high-end digital mixers but makes life so much easier and is a pleasure to use.

best regards
Knut

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

Admin Knut: I totally agree FF800 is still the best in its class. Also agree it sounds a little "cold" compared to others being totaly neutral. That is what I expect from audio interface.

Nowdays we have dozens of computer manufacturers on windows platform we have 3 different OS; XP, Vista an win7 32 and 64 bit versions. It is now difficult to make fully compatible audio interface and driver. I'm shure you put a lot of effort just for ex. 3.xxx driver for FF400/800. A lot of work means more chances for bugs. Every bug/issue is a big problem for users like me. In year 2004 when you started FF800 story there was mostly just XP on win platform and as i know most of FW interfaces with TI chips. My old, old compaq notebook (XP, TI) works absolutely perfect with FF800. But it has too little processing power for what I do with the sound (regardless that use Intel IPP and MKL libs for dsp stuff).

Custom PCI(e) IO + standard FW/USB is something that I would really like to see with the new Fire Face. You can put good old FF800 DAC's and audio preamp circuits inside as they are good enough for another 6 years of production.

Re: Fireface 800 update planned?

Admin Knut wrote:

I?am sure most users will be blown away from all the new stuff in TotalMix FX, which now not only competes directly with high-end digital mixers but makes life so much easier and is a pleasure to use.

Which is why I am eagerly anticipating the new (non-FX) TotalMix features being available for our HDSPe MADI/AIO recording/broadcast DAW, and why the AIO might be bypassed in favour of a Babyface shortly after it becomes available in Australia (hi, Steve!) ....  :-)

De gustibus - et sonus - non est disputandum