Topic: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

Hello,

I have a Fireface UC and just got a headphone with 300 ohm impedance.

I already knew the UC could drive it, and it does, but I wonder what output setting I should set between Hi-gain and +4dBu.
Is there any particular reason to chose one or the other? Isn't hi-gain better suited to serve the 300 ohm impedance?

Thanks in advance for any feedback,
    Mario

i7700k@4.2GHz/16GB RAM/RME FFUC/1.25TB SSD/4TB HD/Win10x64
http://www.reverbnation.com/errepici

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

I would choose the setting which makes it possible to set the output level closer to 0dB to maximize SNR.

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub14

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

uhm how can you measure output loudness in a headphone?

i7700k@4.2GHz/16GB RAM/RME FFUC/1.25TB SSD/4TB HD/Win10x64
http://www.reverbnation.com/errepici

4

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

Who talked about or mentioned 'output loudness' or 'measuring'?

Ramses talked about the fader setting in TM FX - obviously, IMHO.

Regards
Matthias Carstens
RME

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

Sorry didn't mean to be raw in my reply, I have DBFS faders also on my DAW and meters like Digicheck etc., so I'm not so sure about what the mentioned output level refers to.

I try to rephrase my question: is there any cons in using Hi-Gain output level in RME configuration panel versus +4dBu for 300 ohm headphones (distortion, potential risk of damaging something and so) or is it ok?

I am thinking Hi-gain on a high impedance headphone is similar to using an headphone amplifier, that for this kind of situation usually brings to better overall audio quality...

Thanks,
    Mario

i7700k@4.2GHz/16GB RAM/RME FFUC/1.25TB SSD/4TB HD/Win10x64
http://www.reverbnation.com/errepici

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

Use the setting which gives you the loudest cans at max volume - best dynamics. You’re welcome

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.ph … 05#p166005
https://forum.rme-audio.de/viewtopic.ph … 11#p166011

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub14

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

Thank you, this is surely interesting but my question was not about output level rather on the best output settings related to the impedance of the connected headphone.

I tend to mix at fairly low levels, just wished to understand if Hi-gain setting is suitable (and recommended?) for high impedance headphones...

- Mario

i7700k@4.2GHz/16GB RAM/RME FFUC/1.25TB SSD/4TB HD/Win10x64
http://www.reverbnation.com/errepici

9 (edited by ramses 2021-02-26 12:44:54)

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

The reason for my reply was in return to post #6, not to listen too loud...

In terms of your original question my proposal:
- Save the the two different reference level settings to two different snapshots.
- Ensure, that the resulting volume is exactly the same.
- Loop audio for ~15-20 seconds where you think that you can detect audio deviations best

Perform blind tests to compare A/B with the help of a friend, so that you never know whether A or B is being used.
Do you hear an audible difference with the two different reference level settings at the same final volume level ?
Repeat tests multiple times. Can you exactly say whether its A or B ?
Pls check and keep what suits best to you.

I would guess, that you might have higher SNR when choosing the Reflevel settings which make it possible to use TM FX output level settings closer to 0dB, but that this little difference in SNR is not audible.

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub14

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

IFAICS easy, use the lowest reference level you can get enough volume with on your headphones. This will optimise SN and dynamic range of the converters

Vincent, Amsterdam
https://soundcloud.com/thesecretworld
BFpro fs, 2X HDSP9652 ADI-8AE, 2X HDSP9632

11 (edited by ramses 2021-02-26 13:44:33)

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

vinark wrote:

IFAICS easy, use the lowest reference level you can get enough volume with on your headphones. This will optimise SN and dynamic range of the converters

See post #2 and #4 vinark .. but he doesn't seem to believe that it is simple like that.

Therefore I proposed to use his best measurement devices .. his ears.
But maybe he needs an official "amen" from designer level (->MC) perspective.

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub14

12 (edited by torbenscharling 2021-02-26 14:23:58)

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

ramses wrote:

The reason for my reply was in return to post #6, not to listen too loud...

?! I appreciate your inputs, and while interesting points of view, it’s a complete misinterpretation of the point:

I simply state to use the setting which gives maximum headroom, in laments terms: loudest output setting (on the hardware, if there is any such option) this has nothing to do with what volume you then chose to listen to or not, once that output setting is set. The OP is asking for advice on the best output setting, which is obviously the one that’s at the most powerful setting. Obviously you would then adjust your master out in Totalmix to match a normal listening level, but I thought that would be a given.

13 (edited by ramses 2021-02-26 14:56:37)

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

Yes maybe I misunderstood your posting.
It sounded to me (possibly understood wrongly) as if you would suggest to use the highest volume to reach highest dynamic.

> The OP is asking for advice on the best output setting, which is obviously the one that’s at the most powerful setting.

Sorry, I doubt this is correctly written / proposed.
As a starting point .. can we agree that everybody has a certain target volume which is comfortably for ones ears ?
On my UFX+ phones outputs this is
- output volume in TM FX set to -14 dB at reference level "Low" (Analog 9/10 OUT)
- output volume in TM FX set to -28 dB at reference level "High" (Analog 11/12 OUT)
I plugged my phones between 1st and 2nd phones output back and forth to ensure the same volume level.
With these settings I reached the maximum volume, more I do not want, to not stress my ears.

Well and now sound wise I hear no difference.
The only difference is, that SNR will be
- higher with output fader set to -14dB at ref level "low"
- compared to -28dB at ref level High

Similar logic like explained here, chapter 21.3
https://www.rme-audio.de/download/adi2profsr_d.pdf
https://www.rme-audio.de/download/adi2profsr_e.pdf

It makes no sens IMHO to say "Use the setting which gives you the loudest cans at max volume - best dynamics."
Max volume would be too loud .. you need to compare with equal / tolerable volume levels.
And then the lower ref level wins, as you can use it with the output fader closer to 0dB (to maximize SNR).

Does this make sense to everybody or did I misunderstand something ?

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub14

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

You where on the right track initially but then you forget my comment was, as I said agiven that AFTER you check max levels with cans, you THEN set the level you want to monitor at. For you, it’s setting predefined -whatever db for others it’s turning the output dial up and down as we see fit according the whatever audio we’re working on. My point about max output volume is, IF there is a setting to chose between various output settings, volume wise that is, as the OP was referring to: Use the setting which gives you the loudest volume out of your headphones. This does not translate to “listen at that volume” it’s just a reference for how loud it maxes out at, and since the OP has 300o cans, it does not make sense to use an output setting which does not fully enable the cans potential. This Potentiel will translate to the cans even at low listening levels. Hopefully that makes sense.

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

ramses wrote:
vinark wrote:

IFAICS easy, use the lowest reference level you can get enough volume with on your headphones. This will optimise SN and dynamic range of the converters

See post #2 and #4 vinark .. but he doesn't seem to believe that it is simple like that.

Therefore I proposed to use his best measurement devices .. his ears.
But maybe he needs an official "amen" from designer level (->MC) perspective.

Hi Ramses, that's why I said it again and hopefully even simpler, cause you are right!
And someone else said the opposite

Use the setting which gives you the loudest cans at max volume - best dynamics. You’re welcome

, which is true if you could listen at that max level, but you won't, way toooooo loud.

Vincent, Amsterdam
https://soundcloud.com/thesecretworld
BFpro fs, 2X HDSP9652 ADI-8AE, 2X HDSP9632

16 (edited by ramses 2021-02-27 07:31:50)

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

Vinark, thanks.

@torbenscharling: somehow we are talking not into the same direction it seems.

I also use different volume levels at work, but if someone wants to know which sounds better, higher or lower reference level, then you can only compare these two different settings with each other if both ref level settings have the same volume. I think it is well known that otherwise it would not be possible to compare qualitatively, because our ears perceive louder as better.

So now you have the choice to either drive with setting "Low" closer to 0dB settings or to pull down the fader further when output level is set to "High" and / but this reduces SNR..

For me 0dB at setting Low is still too loud. And if this is the case also for him, that 0dB at setting "Low" is still loud enough for him, then there is no reason to use the setting "High" where he can not come close to 0dB and potentially needs to stay below "-20dB" or even more (which results in lower SNR).

But whatever he chooses, settings "Low" or "High", he should use his own ears and compare but for this he needs equal volume levels for the explained reason.

I hope this is now better understandable for you what I mean.

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub14

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

Sorrry ramses I think you’re right somehow we’re talking past each other. This is from the manual, and further emphasizes my point (especially with 300ohm cans):

“But isn’t +22 dBu, or Hi-Power as it is called in the menu, much too loud for modern phones? That depends. There are still phones that need higher levels. Music can be low in volume but consume a lot of power, especially with lots of sub-bass. And lots of headroom is always nice to have. Typically with Hi-Power off, which equals +7 dBu maximum output level, modern music and modern headphones, Hi-Power is mostly not needed. But you will notice that even with Hi- Power active, which requires to use a volume setting 15 dB lower as usual, the sound stays the same, and there is no audible noise or hum at the phones output (provided the source is clean, of course). So even at a Volume setting of -40 dB the ADI-2 DAC delivers perfect sound quality, being a no-brainer in daily use as how to set it.

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

So, could someone quickly answer, for HD600 with 300ohm, totalmix setting 'low' or 'high'...? for mixing?!

I certainly hear the difference and want to best hear less distortion possible (clean monitoring).. I assume that would be 'low' setting right..?!

I don't want to get too technical but for those with high ohm impedance, for cleaner monitoring, 'low' setting should provide the optimum monitoring right? thanks!

19

Re: Optimal headphone output setting for 300 ohm impedance device?

There is no sound difference. That setting only defines the maximum volume available.

Regards
Matthias Carstens
RME