fabriciom wrote:Are the converters in the ADI-8 Pro better then the ones in the AIO?
I'd hope so! That box sold new for over $1000...
FWIW - The ADI-8 Pro and DS's AD/DA latency is more than "A Few samples". The $$$$ QS is the one that has silly low latencies.
Here are the ADI-8 Pro Specs from RME:
Delay from A/D and D/A conversion depends on the chip being used, the ADI-8 PRO itself doesn't add any. Delay within converters is caused by the oversampling and subsequent digital filtering. AKM5392: 39 samples, AD1852: 43 samples.
http://www.rme-audio.de/old/english/techinfo/adi8.htm
Which basically doubles your 32 Sample ASIO buffer on an HDSP card (the ADI-8 Pro adds approx 2ms I/O). This isn't a deal-breaker by any means - but a little more than "insignificant" IMO...
Apogee's Symphony low "Native latencies" are largely attributed to their very low AD/DA conversion Latency (on par with the ADI QS IIRC). You can basically cut your round trip latencies in half by using 32-Sample ASIO buffers with an extremely low latency AD/DA converters. Nothing to cry over (2ms here and there) - but quite possibly beneficial...
MADIface-XT+ARC / 3x HDSP MADI / ADI648
2x SSL Alphalink MADI AX
2x Multiface / 2x Digiface /2x ADI8